Delivery-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 02:35:15 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,
	URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AA651E0EBF
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 02:35:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48558332B8;
	Thu, 12 Feb 2015 07:35:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE995332B0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 07:35:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id kGi3aKFvcurf for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 12 Feb 2015 07:35:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-x232.google.com (mail-ob0-x232.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::232])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84682332A2
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 07:35:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ob0-f178.google.com with SMTP id uz6so8304483obc.9
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:35:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=26C+RfV47WIsyTqNlMgLfFUiHsq2ZdSPtIsukBGrlSU=;
 b=RIkQ53fl6mjRaxELfk4b9tCyyHJB7/GutkqmoC2Id6t83Pj4C7lDLbCig1OIjD/MdP
 ntyzXrpOjzulEDajsD9aOjxsQQg4q7uRdUPHwngobacxYB5F9prPznKzGKcu6zes5GZn
 Eg3ssZPwSGUCgD5kmX+b9f//YQ+ii5e3Ex8+YoJvFwzPfUpy6vpaqZck/r0OK17gnVt/
 2C96orFtP/LTqyuUWmbSxlehdPNxEFT4aIuL6ZN3dwc7mIpZYIx0IYbMZPLyWNMOOf1w
 hqhYhwfVw0f81J3JbDvXbhHBciIa835lAdv9y98WKptzioQHlv26tvEauuf77D/E3zca
 Xqmw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.96.167 with SMTP id dt7mr1773876oeb.54.1423726504036;
 Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:35:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.140.199 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:35:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54DBD10A.3070104@rawbw.com>
References: <20150211151746.46572ka7qifqi6g4@www.vfemail.net>
 <54DBD10A.3070104@rawbw.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 02:35:03 -0500
Message-ID: <CAD2Ti29VfWBpmNPcS5B6Pw9m-GU-DpmBDb-HNSnDj6io8825qg@mail.gmail.com>
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>
To: cypherpunks@cpunks.org
Cc: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] REAL-ID Internet Access Coming Soon
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> wrote:
>
> On 02/11/2015 13:17, goofyzrnssm@vfemail.net wrote:
>>
>> If a `REAL-ID Internet Access' law were to gain traction in the U.S., how
>> would such a law be enforced exactly?

Use your imagination.

> Real ID enforcement would violate people's anonymity rights, which are very
> well protected in US (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymity#United_States).

We're not talking about books and soapboxing today, class. We're talking
about "papers please" being required for everything you do. Including,
among other things, your internet access at home, mobile, in the library,
coffee shop and so on. Today you can somewhat preserve your right to be
anonymous and bigdata free, by manipulating inputs to some of these
things. If you haven't noticed, that's become steadily harder over time.

> So there is no
> chance of this happening in US.

Hah! That's what you think. Pending some games in the
Supreme Court (if there are any brave souls left), it's already done...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/REAL_ID_Act

> The OP was primarily concerned about other countries.

No. China and Facebook were referenced as two that were
already doing a semantic equivalent of REAL-ID for certain
usage contexts of the internet. And it was described what will
happen if you don't act. (If you know anything about history,
it should be clear that that applies to all places on the planet,
and that failure to act gets you what they want, not what you
want.)

You can add Russia to the list now too...
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/15/02/11/2245240/russia-seeking-to-ban-tor-vpns-and-other-anonymizing-tools
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

