Delivery-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:19:43 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 014301E0B7C;
	Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:19:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC9E38B01;
	Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:19:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A45438A5D
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:19:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id lo1vzP7E2Erw for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:19:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lf0-x233.google.com (mail-lf0-x233.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::233])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0BB138A59
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:19:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lfed137 with SMTP id d137so15117511lfe.3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:19:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=uafyx5+wWcpOIiRQ5k2yFD1Vg1hFXDKoem1IiUBJufQ=;
 b=JsPi8Ep/oxSyCgePDMbPNNBw0cIFL149niMinaDgYLgFakqJG9ngPhAtXzVGCYwlZw
 4dB1WFNhnhsAHLdB3IZW60/+0kVOTRQ9/WcqUAu1I7LSlzRSuys8py0skBz0abzh4lSZ
 q5VLH7mbnjLYWijw/sqzC3q46SJa0XuTnb7TdVd65MThOdqpLmtURFDNLik0oBOuwQZS
 ZQOX5AAphVSl1RG+bHFaxszHgg7Rkg/u4sSIa1Q8J2Ed19v+Nfte6UhxtHwkPEK7Fa8Y
 wF1q2haH8SwRbxGZahiAdhzk4rUQv3bMFd8fCosn4bgfwGljFtxvkR4qVcnie7woCoYZ
 5cEA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.42.208 with SMTP id q199mr6350443lfq.67.1449782366492;
 Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:19:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.40.66 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:19:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7BBE58D1-A72D-42B0-B564-517E7A5DF6D3@nrl.navy.mil>
References: <5669CCA2.6080307@openmailbox.org> <20151210192501.GA31965@raoul>
 <7BBE58D1-A72D-42B0-B564-517E7A5DF6D3@nrl.navy.mil>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:19:26 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJVRA1TYORQ-xU1m+kG96PFDxc27GBhLw-DaitFqq89C9z-25Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: coderman <coderman@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] single entity running >36% exit probability with 5
 relays? scary.
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 12/10/15, Rob Jansen <rob.g.jansen@nrl.navy.mil> wrote:
> ...
> That is definitely an error! I rebooted the nodes but it appears that their
> consensus weights in the latest consensus have not been corrected. So I just
> took them down now.


thank you to everyone for acting transparently and conservatively in
this situation.

has a trac ticket been created for this issue?


best regards.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

