Delivery-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 07:23:01 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C6661E0183;
	Thu,  3 Dec 2015 07:23:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4FA38061;
	Thu,  3 Dec 2015 12:22:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C52938056
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu,  3 Dec 2015 12:22:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id u4FJokF9iIj9 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu,  3 Dec 2015 12:22:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pindarots.xs4all.nl (pindarots.xs4all.nl [82.161.210.87])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "surfplank2", Issuer "surfplank2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2530A38034
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu,  3 Dec 2015 12:22:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 1695 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at eugeni;
 Thu, 03 Dec 2015 12:22:49 UTC
Received: from surfplank2.hierzo (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by pindarots.xs4all.nl (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id tB3BsU0m016251
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO)
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 12:54:30 +0100
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
From: Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh@xs4all.nl>
Organization: hierzo
Message-ID: <56602D76.8080505@xs4all.nl>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 12:54:30 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [tor-talk] observed bandwidth too low
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Hello!

Recently the speed of my vdsl line was upgraded so I allotted a higher
bandwidth to tor.
When I observe my node on atlas.torproject.org though, I see a
significantly lower observed bandwidth than the configured bandwidth
limits or even the actual available bandwidth.

I did adjust the traffic shaping to the new bandwidth situation and the
uplink is not nearly saturated.

How can I find the cause of this low bandwidth observation?

Kind regards,
Udo
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

