Delivery-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:52:00 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL,
	DKIM_SIGNED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAF541E0FAC;
	Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:51:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D11031E99;
	Thu, 11 Dec 2014 02:51:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F6431E85
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 02:51:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id l9Yuk1m1zKKC for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 11 Dec 2014 02:51:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from latitanza.investici.org (latitanza.investici.org
 [IPv6:2001:888:2000:56::19])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.autistici.org",
 Issuer "Autistici/Inventati Certification Authority" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05E222D511
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 02:51:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [82.94.249.234] (latitanza [82.94.249.234]) (Authenticated
 sender: minibon@subvertising.org) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id
 B33A1121621
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 02:51:44 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hacari.com;
 s=stigmate; t=1418266305;
 bh=X0Ewwx83GcsLHBbcygI7EIzEP7HWbWD72Qn5ohmSsmQ=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References;
 b=nwRJ3vcZo3tvgoGHFN/qeMdLX6Gx/1QV1r+GYgpaU9WvbY9FeKw1RjytG/alORBpv
 wXQLLj3t79v0HHNZBipBBmNv9eHorz6yTyYGIZKXfqPMSGQkk/GvcMsFC8X4ZEusyO
 2Q5cB+/URZlWS1J7d/bX6F6WHLlfFdKxf9TIhx6k=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 02:51:43 +0000
From: Sieme <sieme@hacari.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <54890250.7030600@riseup.net>
References: <22b9f013c8ef0f36b66963a8edc23f2c@subvertising.org>
 <54890250.7030600@riseup.net>
Message-ID: <5cf56ef1f8f78a360d93f593f5fc7758@subvertising.org>
X-Sender: sieme@hacari.com
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor network too fast
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

I think so too. But what's the default policy now? 3 hops? Or when the 
circuit is established it turns to a 1 hop circuit? Because 100ms seems 
to be a 1 hop circuit like a simple proxy, not an onion routing of 3 
HOPS.
I tried to recompile Tor sources, but it's harder than changing a 
variable, because the code doesn't seems to obey to the default hop 
length when circuit is established.
I believe in conspirations, so do the HOP policy is against us and 
helping NSA to easy trace all Tor users?
In help of my theory, a lot of hidden services was closed in the recent 
past times, maybe not using any hacking techniques but only hacking the 
Tor flux.
If that it's possible, I think that Tor is only another weapon in the 
hands of western government to do propaganda in China and Iran, and a 
stupid proxy for Americans and European people.
Please tell me that at least Torproject is "innocent", is only a group 
of computer scientists, and not a trojan organization. But it's hard to 
think, because maybe near the 100% of the sponsors come from our USA 
government, and, thinking about how was in the past, encryption was 
illegal if too good. Why now can we have a so powerful instrument like 
Tor? Or Tor is not secure by design as we think?

Let there be light


-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

