Delivery-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:11:38 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E28E1E04C0
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:11:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997D9327B9;
	Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:11:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F1C32634
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:11:28 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id domc0SNkcJRx for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:11:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.anonymail.us (unknown [162.243.112.143])
 (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CBB032631
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:11:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (anonymail.us [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.anonymail.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4ECF104B24
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:11:25 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.anonymail.us
Received: from mail.anonymail.us ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail.anonymail.us [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id uMa0zriylMuL for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:11:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.1.98] (172-4-22-58.lightspeed.tulsok.sbcglobal.net
 [172.4.22.58])
 by mail.anonymail.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4383104AF4;
 Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:11:21 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <54A16F18.5020307@cpunk.us>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 09:11:20 -0600
From: Cypher <cypher@cpunk.us>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org, cypherpunks@cpunks.org
Subject: [tor-talk] Question about something said about Tor in the Der
	Spiegel data dump
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

First, let me say I'm sorry if this is posted twice. My mail client gave
me an error and, since I still haven't seen it hit either list, I'm
sending it again. My apologies if this is a duplicate.

So I'm looking through the Der Spiegel data dump and noticed the
following statement on document 35543:

"The client must not be running a Tor router of their own..."

That made me thing of a few questions but I'm specifically wondering
what they mean here.

1. Do they mean that it is confusing to them if I am connecting to the
Tor network from a computer that also runs a relay but I do not have my
client configured to use my relay

or

2. Do they mean that it is confusing to them if I am connecting to the
Tor network through a relay running on my own machine?

Perhaps I'm not even asking this question correctly as it 'feels' like
the wrong way. But I'm curious. What are your thoughts?

Cypher
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

