Delivery-Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 01:24:40 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E5341E09F2
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 01:24:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A73332BC5;
	Sat, 27 Dec 2014 06:24:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56DE132BB9
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 06:24:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id Mhw0u6XwB-Gb for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat, 27 Dec 2014 06:24:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:4830:134:3::e])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3076B32B45
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 06:24:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ol168-138.fibertel.com.ar ([24.232.138.168]:58958
 helo=raiz.hellekin.gnu)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <hellekin@gnu.org>) id 1Y4knY-00013F-CY
 for tor-talk@lists.torproject.org; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 01:24:25 -0500
Message-ID: <549E5093.5020706@gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 03:24:19 -0300
From: hellekin <hellekin@gnu.org>
Organization: https://gnu.org/consensus
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <CADop2NFebQT5uW-qdMrPgYD6wOiQTs9btoVnB83jcDxTu_tY5A@mail.gmail.com>
 <549E154A.5030500@riseup.net>
 <15effbe6df612678ae6ff2a399a3a6c1.squirrel@mail.riseup.net>
 <549E1E78.8080802@gnu.org>
 <CAMTdTS8ahqKK76o1k43SgoRvEdE7dGNLhXqx5dSJKsT6XYdBqw@mail.gmail.com>
 <549E2A85.2030002@gnu.org>
 <CAMTdTS-3bGzKGNRaecDEPbTw0hK3u8_ZdbxTMbObYPaR-012Rg@mail.gmail.com>
 <549E47B6.9000900@gnu.org>
 <CAMTdTS8PzJEUYK56C7rhOH7kwYO1A5=ThUYSiP6tBEfaZW2yhA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMTdTS8PzJEUYK56C7rhOH7kwYO1A5=ThUYSiP6tBEfaZW2yhA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Is there a representative of the LizardSquad on this
 list?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 12/27/2014 03:06 AM, benjamin barber wrote:
> I don't represent the lizards, but when legitimate concerns are hand-waved
> away, perhaps it should be shown the the emperor has no clothes.
>
*** I don't represent the Tor project, and I agree that legitimate
concerns should be addressed...  But if you were a bit more explicit on
what concerns were waved away, maybe resolution would be possible.

> a less trivial and noticeable attack is possible.
>
> Unless there is some significant staff
> changes in the future, I'm with the lizardsquad in exposing tor.
>
*** If you're for blackmailing Tor, you should at least be explicit
about your demands ("significant staff changes"?) and conscious about
what you're doing.  I've read that the Lizard Squad are "ethical
terrorists".  I don't think ethical goes well with blackmailing.

==
hk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=2QsJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

