Delivery-Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 22:42:15 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FFD11E0100
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 22:42:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3166A32B19;
	Sat, 27 Dec 2014 03:42:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E841C3293E
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 03:42:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id Wq9OWIy6WMXC for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat, 27 Dec 2014 03:42:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:4830:134:3::e])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C396532202
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 03:42:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ol168-138.fibertel.com.ar ([24.232.138.168]:56020
 helo=raiz.hellekin.gnu)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <hellekin@gnu.org>) id 1Y4iGQ-0005Ks-FE
 for tor-talk@lists.torproject.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 22:42:02 -0500
Message-ID: <549E2A85.2030002@gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 00:41:57 -0300
From: hellekin <hellekin@gnu.org>
Organization: https://gnu.org/consensus
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <CADop2NFebQT5uW-qdMrPgYD6wOiQTs9btoVnB83jcDxTu_tY5A@mail.gmail.com>
 <549E154A.5030500@riseup.net>
 <15effbe6df612678ae6ff2a399a3a6c1.squirrel@mail.riseup.net>
 <549E1E78.8080802@gnu.org>
 <CAMTdTS8ahqKK76o1k43SgoRvEdE7dGNLhXqx5dSJKsT6XYdBqw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMTdTS8ahqKK76o1k43SgoRvEdE7dGNLhXqx5dSJKsT6XYdBqw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Is there a representative of the LizardSquad on this
 list?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 12/27/2014 12:24 AM, benjamin barber wrote:
> Yes, if not for the fact that Tor have been *COMPLETELY* receptive to
> criticisms about how they run things.
>
> Its not as if some members of Tor are bigoted and walk around with a chip
> on their shoulder against 'enemies'.
>
*** I fail to understand the technical argument you're making regarding
a potential 0day threat to the Tor network.  If you'd like to explain
the threat in technical terms, leaving aside the messy human details of
how we routinely misunderstand each other, that would certainly help the
discussion move towards happy resolution.

If you believe the threat is real, then you should probably send
encrypted email to the proper channel for security issues with Tor.  Did
you do this, and try to come straight to the mailing list for getting
things done?

I don't know how "Tor" would react to criticism, but I'm certain you
won't get any positive reaction if you don't try to formulate criticism
without feeling the need to antagonize the discussion. So, let's say
there's no enemy, what's the next step?

==
hk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUnip+XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAw
MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg98S0QAID+XjIOuxFiDXl3X31nEFwD
L7PBwpBlW3jmJRi4pV2SWj1zi3CpIkVCB7CVMSmKNCgx9w0QtKkBhtF3sSAx04we
LYqLpU20oYdz0ARGPcDbkoiXXCjaE1D6riu5//Gu2Tgu6cfvGNF0X0KdNKvtC6zN
pyjvu0SWdhdwg02Um7WhP/YZZK3Dt7JN2Svr7XgM929nSq54TjZIKXgBhlXnoP12
ZH/ZXL8p3mmZYes+kPgBxXCfadgZmd19sfspX56K2TvOKVj4J/aROgwNwxCBRUQ+
lQSkCYFoE/YJ2Cd/+voU6o8WprDCSecGElU3bObEY+M3l5MznxkLG8h08rylFh7U
fF6EvKIhUNYGJUm/rv69Qivlt3pYmDZ4ixhFU+blF/8fjOwZ98SVcen8VXT5tH6M
JG0EhBjEdGP5NTTZYYr7V6OANxIT8Ps9zwzVQP2NE3IUVW/PntDq1M+XmHueUeyZ
q6hvw5mrqtRGrPoqx8e0p4XH+eQzdxcyxDyR+geTGJeSalCIjJO0a3qyUPXlbzVK
VpJ+86WDo2tPWw180dh9rlP7LRWAs5UQ+K8hTyfgOKoRZRka8XAZLDyZhYbLfX/f
z8VOXkBi2srtDcoWLSNSrxSg0KMvGDWZqINGTMuDAdv061dM3/JP9VCUuwDds3LT
v6VtBwW22wCYlI3gSBsg
=S6AU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

