Delivery-Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 21:50:50 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D87C01E09F0
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 21:50:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C9332B66;
	Sat, 27 Dec 2014 02:50:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B02D032B63
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 02:50:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id cfDov268urmj for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat, 27 Dec 2014 02:50:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:4830:134:3::e])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FF0532B58
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 02:50:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ol168-138.fibertel.com.ar ([24.232.138.168]:55442
 helo=raiz.hellekin.gnu)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <hellekin@gnu.org>) id 1Y4hSg-0004nk-UB
 for tor-talk@lists.torproject.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 21:50:39 -0500
Message-ID: <549E1E78.8080802@gnu.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 23:50:32 -0300
From: hellekin <hellekin@gnu.org>
Organization: https://gnu.org/consensus
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <CADop2NFebQT5uW-qdMrPgYD6wOiQTs9btoVnB83jcDxTu_tY5A@mail.gmail.com>
 <549E154A.5030500@riseup.net>
 <15effbe6df612678ae6ff2a399a3a6c1.squirrel@mail.riseup.net>
In-Reply-To: <15effbe6df612678ae6ff2a399a3a6c1.squirrel@mail.riseup.net>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Is there a representative of the LizardSquad on this
 list?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 12/26/2014 11:30 PM, lizards@riseup.net wrote:
> If you're going to be guessing you should probably point that out instead
> of presenting your guesses as facts. We are not trying to flood the dir
> with offline relays.
> 
> The fact that you've been referring to this as a Sybil attempt since the
> beginning just makes you look dumb, there'd be no point in even attempting
> with so few /16s.
>
*** Instead of playing smartass and mysterious masters of deception, why
don't you simply explain what you're up to instead of coming as
non-cooperative entity trying to show off your skillz and waving a 0day
threat over the network?

"Hello people, we have found a 0day.  Can we talk with tor developers
about it, and maybe try it live?" would have been so much friendlier.

But no, instead, you're acting like brats.  OK, you've got adult
attention, now what?

==
hk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=tW3a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

