Delivery-Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 21:48:19 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F23C1E09F2
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 21:48:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED60032B50;
	Sat, 27 Dec 2014 02:48:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB8B32B51
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 02:48:12 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id LxjnNguQ6ypo for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat, 27 Dec 2014 02:48:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-f176.google.com (mail-qc0-f176.google.com
 [209.85.216.176])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33B8532B50
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 02:48:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f176.google.com with SMTP id i17so7924676qcy.35
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 18:48:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=mime-version:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :content-type;
 bh=s2/ozllkLnHVJqF4OA5LntCQvZWsJ1Id7XNWp2x9Jxo=;
 b=XnoEZqJf0ausZxjiLK80yfeZj/9kOhqkfQVCpnKtQ8yVkrSaVGXu5ZU3dfiVVhte7U
 +fJJtrFW0Nqe5Rm5jJwsHXJNZl8a4Ck2z3KZrBbjUEFJjtOF/pby0da52S1SV1pOzMTt
 zOSEBafdwvi7Go4kBvy12Dt8yklAyb9ovwdVm8gU736KvSEClb2g5jFH9N7Ixzz8uOym
 2IRbAmk9XOT2jHSn9uIDaXSFh0H7B781GCE75ZspBkJTPNOLwn0Doy2CI09Z7++YmJEP
 vWm6oS03TVxkfBiz3f0SSLK0tSo9Q2Ju/g7uN+XHv6XeSYMni0o5jvr8i+k4jK0ANNWv
 WsSQ==
X-Received: by 10.224.120.8 with SMTP id b8mr62865565qar.36.1419648489077;
 Fri, 26 Dec 2014 18:48:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADop2NFebQT5uW-qdMrPgYD6wOiQTs9btoVnB83jcDxTu_tY5A@mail.gmail.com>
 <9aa7939699aae1a89ee5835036780b07.squirrel@mail.riseup.net>
From: Lucas Nicodemus <shank@shanked.me>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 02:48:08 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAcjiAvaOsPvPmtv=tfPfDQqya7Zw+=jC8DLNHe4ei5ipo5MdQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Is there a representative of the LizardSquad on this
	list?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

The fact of the matter is, you tweeted that you were attempting a zero day
exploit with Tor, and you used a large number of nodes to (accomplish?)
that. Whether or not you were or were not attempting a Sybil attack, that's
the only thing that people can see as the "attack" that was mentioned.

I mean, if you wanted to you could maybe publically post saying that you
were creating free exits, instead of saying that Tor users are
criminals/pedos/hackers.

E.g.

https://twitter.com/LizardMafia/status/548666216089653248
https://twitter.com/LizardMafia/status/548605171828543490
https://twitter.com/LizardMafia/status/548575072332836864
https://twitter.com/LizardMafia/status/548525026027507712

Tor's network is all about consensus; adding new relays is super detectable
and easy to mitigate. The system is decentralized. If someone (e.g. a
government) wanted it gone, it would have been removed a long time ago.

You manning the email account appear to at least be mildly interested in
supporting Tor, but it seems like the Twitter account person is working
opposite in force. That's all it looks like to me.

On Fri Dec 26 2014 at 6:58:20 PM <lizards@riseup.net> wrote:

> There is no Sybil attack.
> > If yes, it'd be nice to know what your aims are in the Sybil attack.
> > Because thus far it is unclear to me what your motives or objectives
> > are.
> >
> > -V
> > --
> > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
> >
>
>
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

