Delivery-Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 14:54:53 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,
	URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BF401E0805
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 14:54:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931BF329F6;
	Fri, 26 Dec 2014 19:54:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B168A329CE
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 19:54:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id NB-VGdvVxKad for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 26 Dec 2014 19:54:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-x22a.google.com (mail-la0-x22a.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 513AB321CF
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 19:54:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id gd6so9259372lab.1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 11:54:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=Rf9FZNVwegFhGj5L3eQRginotX89+lI7VaojQoozhZY=;
 b=FftVfyzVyLYfT1es9IcgfJC+6KjE1oy29GoYOgRDG77qwvygsU/Nt8dbqrefNrDFbq
 QWSCvijSAOap806kh+3Xc8DIc4FsAnmWGI0Mee50+KlU0pNZBUSNgoArKVR+npFJd30D
 FIbtEys2kpMSBooKtQo+oNJNyaOfiDKYNQkXhZxNxTMJwhblq4hwf3cs4EEmU4w3Nz7L
 W40bKETlJPsUJooUrHI9Lflxgp/uXDfoQAERk8M3bHTUkMs9j8xcLyXNKKakzI+bOzQz
 VWAnJin4EQBIdQtJ8SCvy7RRHO6Xl1IHZShRhoUrTWEH3jnWoKIJIZk/Bo9C/EPBuF9B
 e/gA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.197.5 with SMTP id iq5mr44770035lac.6.1419623681029;
 Fri, 26 Dec 2014 11:54:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.133.3 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 11:54:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <549DAE86.7020307@riseup.net>
References: <549D9025.6050602@riseup.net>
 <57d1668ad26c1cb9f7810538ae5333f7@horsefucker.org>
 <1133e715658fff4575b65b9212ca2c08.squirrel@mail.riseup.net>
 <549DAE86.7020307@riseup.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 14:54:40 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJ5w9HXdW9kgVgLinuw0n2zBPL4U26fSTedL_j3gH1Odgb-sBg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Soul Plane <soulplane11@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] 3347 "lizardNSA" Relays on google cloud.
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Thomas White <thomaswhite@riseup.net>
wrote:

> It is dangerous. I've run a cluster of exits for a long time and
> people like myself and Moritz know the dangers of reducing the
> diversity pool. Adding even a gigabit of exits to a single AS right
> now is dangerous and I've consulted arma on the topic before who
> agreed. Beyond 25% of the network is dangerous and higher than that
> could cause serious anonymity implications.
>

Why turn down more bandwidth? If all of the exits are being run by the same
person or group why not mark them all as family members of the same group?
I checked a few of them and I don't see that they list family members.
Unless I misunderstand what family members is for?

https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#MultipleRelays
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

