Delivery-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:40:39 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,
	URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B54731E045E;
	Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:40:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B266B32065;
	Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:40:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D2632023
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:40:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id eUHaScd7OuIa for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:40:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-x242.google.com (mail-wi0-x242.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::242])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15C0D31E8C
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:40:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f194.google.com with SMTP id l15so3528198wiw.9
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:40:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
 h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
 :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=bjvV+y1+1eOhgZjAp8nuMmtIrOBzvUVSKc3gg/dDc3k=;
 b=TSmEfWHsHpC6imCm5ig8IxctF2VyDPiDjIvhKdZXvqedlOSKMaQF+Sh0kNE9vpY9nZ
 P8Ba6D8GJVDRKE0uP95lepbSx3fpMmNcS/tS/nNww66sev9DInHwN5FU2CLbKJF+MmD1
 D0xpLut6FRHMRzckNA2HPgn+6zHmMIKxd4KWd/3a6K8UwtVF/wj8qCq7JoCg4JwfkfOe
 WLdMrI+wH7io3o+d18S5IcVfrs3KgF5q3S+sb4ncyPaGQyL9mc06Kixk9E32KkzHKNOB
 9ZA9jBXf61O7+2W/YiJi8qMrENe4u2N2ckWM1bKGw0rJJ2Ih9bbo03SgFF1VXlBdOW8X
 jI+g==
X-Received: by 10.180.210.236 with SMTP id mx12mr7437882wic.16.1418679626983; 
 Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:40:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.129]
 (dslb-188-100-174-120.188.100.pools.vodafone-ip.de. [188.100.174.120])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id vm8sm14512660wjc.6.2014.12.15.13.40.25
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:40:26 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <548F5549.9000305@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:40:25 +0100
From: "Sebastian G. <bastik.tor>" <bastik.tor@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <20141211220732.GG34412@moria.seul.org>
 <CAAS2fgTNWCJcdOq6nd_XJC2e=iPCRxk-a4kiOgxQFnQ+2K8Ahg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20141211223234.GH34412@moria.seul.org>
 <548b322b.0480e00a.1143.ffffb753@mx.google.com>
 <20141212192012.GI34412@moria.seul.org>
 <548b52ee.f4698c0a.3562.ffffe389@mx.google.com> <548B69B5.4010801@riseup.net>
 <548b9707.275f8c0a.9917.1e7c@mx.google.com> <548BA998.7090705@riseup.net>
 <548f4778.b4248c0a.1158.09c8@mx.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <548f4778.b4248c0a.1158.09c8@mx.google.com>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Trusting in Tor (was: Tor and solidarity against
 online harassment)
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

15.12.2014, 21:43 Juan:

I'd like to uncouple this from the thread as it is not about the initial
topic, unfortunately, I think.

>> My point, which you sidestep, is that it's past time for you to
>> produce some evidence for backdoors in Tor. 
> 
> 	Did I ever state "there are backdoors"? No I didn't. You
> 	are asking for evidence to back up something I never said.
> 
> 	On the other hand, what would a backdoor in tor or similar
> 	software look like? I'm guessing there are no 'backdoors' in
> 	tor, only 'bugs'. I think it's called "plausible deniability"
> 	or something like that...
> 

Unfortunately that is true, Tor contains bugs. Probably hidden and hard
to trigger, as I hope unit-test would uncover trivial bugs.

> 
>> are free to inspect the source code, to probe the network as you like
>> with your relays and clients, and to do whatever else you can
>> imagine. Go for it.
> 
> 	Why on earth should I do other people's work? Help the
> 	propaganda efforts of the US government? Please =)

I don't think that it would be helpful if you aren't doing it for the
fun, the fame or whatever else code reviewers reasons are... beside money.

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

