Delivery-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:41:32 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,
	URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D4AA1E0B6E;
	Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:41:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287EA32224;
	Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:41:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB0732165
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:41:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id XqLD9NTi7QRL for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:41:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22b.google.com (mail-qa0-x22b.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22b])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF25B3214B
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:41:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id bm13so5615470qab.2
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:41:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=Fy2nMWLYInhC/kelbgYSubA0UpafTTlFflcOOd+7n64=;
 b=LT26LwwojVsmDuCcRo3kOwbFYp1FY6q5G1zORTktACOj25vylXfMz45kjaJ2MReB0+
 BJzOFbRAJl7059faOFoKauo7gkCIicqnVMzpOqdoYBCfrQsBXG11zaNorP3ZakPU34bJ
 vAgjWVkBfq6JrxbXVWsRxuM+vLEYxWZzllBpSgqkcYxh9kBbwKI0jrxOygiXBUVYnJxF
 Ge/K9xwdVgo7KfBHITOySKeMpGcqyHuQHUO6XyUjJdAKUQvPKYfKBzKo260TIa+WrlcI
 uUfWJj5FvJjeDnT/pcUcfLUqKUc9Qz5G6Cq2bibiTuuFhuLV5MUuJaWNmNAVJPczkyPp
 jbaQ==
X-Received: by 10.140.43.195 with SMTP id e61mr19742435qga.13.1418416879353;
 Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:41:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (host72.200-82-56.telecom.net.ar. [200.82.56.72])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c107sm2423028qgf.11.2014.12.12.12.41.18
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:41:18 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <548b52ee.f4698c0a.3562.ffffe389@mx.google.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:43:28 -0300
From: Juan <juan.g71@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <20141212192012.GI34412@moria.seul.org>
References: <20141211220732.GG34412@moria.seul.org>
 <CAAS2fgTNWCJcdOq6nd_XJC2e=iPCRxk-a4kiOgxQFnQ+2K8Ahg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20141211223234.GH34412@moria.seul.org>
 <548b322b.0480e00a.1143.ffffb753@mx.google.com>
 <20141212192012.GI34412@moria.seul.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.10; i486-slitaz-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor and solidarity against online harassment
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:20:12 -0500
Roger Dingledine <arma@mit.edu> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 03:23:42PM -0300, Juan wrote:
> > > You might like
> > > https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq#Backdoor
> > > 
> > > We won't put backdoors in Tor. Ever.
> > 
> > 	LOL! 
> > 
> > 	You work for the pentagon and are subjects of the US state.
> > 
> > 	The US government has secret 'courts'  and secretly forces
> > its subjects to tamper with all kinds of 'security'  systems, in the
> > 	name of 'national security'.
> > 
> > 	Whatever public declamations you make carry very little
> > weight.
> 
> Hello Mr. Tor hater,

	Well Roger, your very first sentence is baseless name calling.
	You've already lost. Again.

	Like I previously said, if I'm a 'tor hater'  you are lover of
	the murdering US government, which also happens to be your
	employer. 

	
> 
> We get funding from a variety of groups, including US government
> groups. We do not "work for the pentagon" 

	Yes you do. You are 'funded' by the 'department of war' or
	'department of defense'  or department of mass murder

	https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pentagon

	"The Pentagon is the headquarters of the United States
	Department of Defense, "

	I'm glad I cleared the confusion up for you. You're welcome. 

> but that is a separate
> discussion and it shouldn't derail this one.
> 
> We are indeed subjects of various governments,

	tor is a project of the pentagon. All 'key' 'developers'  are
	subjects of the US governemnt. 


> and some of those
> governments have indeed been doing quite bad things lately. The notion
> of a secret law makes me sick.

	That's so touching. But irrelevant. Also, there were no secret
	laws when you started working on tor?


> 
> But when it comes to governments secretly forcing us to do things, no,
> there *is* a choice. And that's why we're telling you we have made
> this choice: No backdoors. Ever.


	So, your 'argument' is baseless repetition of a baseless
	assertion? Impressive. 


> 
> To quote the faq entry, which Nick and I wrote in 2004 and it remains
> true today:
> "We think that putting a backdoor in Tor would be tremendously
> irresponsible to our users, and a bad precedent for security software
> in general."

	Hm. I think this is the fourth time you've repeated that?


> 
> They can't make us put backdoors in. But they can make things
> miserable for us if we don't go along with it 

	At least some truth. Now, given the fact that things aren't
	'miserable' for you...

>-- see the Lavabit case
> for an example (and hopefully one where people learned a lesson about
> centralization too). 

	Funny that you mention lavabit since lavabit was a scam from
	day zero.

	http://www.thoughtcrime.org/blog/lavabit-critique/


	Also, quite funny that you mention 'centralization' since tor is
	 centralized. Well, of course, centralization is just what one
	 would expect from miliary projects. ABC of political
	 philosophy.



> That's a major part of why I try to keep talking
> to the folks who might try to force us into something -- 

	Oh yes. Those nice fellows at the fbi, pentagon, nsa, whatever
	are going to pay so much attention to what you have to
	say...especially if it goes against their interests.


> to explain
> that it won't work, and that it will backfire because then *their*
> colleagues, who need privacy too, will have fewer options, 


	Except that's false. The US government can use tor
	to spy on its 'targets' and use other means for 'secure'
	communications. It's a win-win situation!


>to remind
> them that there are other jurisdictions in the world, and so on.
> 
> Thankfully, and I'd like to think in part because of this directed
> advocacy, it has never come to this decision point for us. That is,
> to be clear, nobody has yet tried to force us, with secret laws or
> otherwise, into undermining Tor.

	LOLOL!

	You are again asserting that you've not been 'served' some kind
	of secret order which is secret by definition. 

	Talk about circular (lack of) logic...


> 
> Now, you're right, these are just words. 


	Correct. Thanks for finally conceding the point. You could have
	saved yourself some typing...


> That's why we try to do all
> of our development in public, and the source code is open, and the
> research communities are active and public, and we engage with many
> communities in person at a wide variety of conferences.

	Non sequitur. From the premise "public source" it doesn't
	follow "no secret orders".



> Please do
> continue to audit and observe and help find potential problems in Tor
> and the ecosystem of software around it.
> 
> We've been working on Tor for more than a decade, and in that time the
> world has been becoming a worse place in many ways for privacy and
> free speech. 

	And who's to blame? Your government =) 


>Haters are going to hate, 

	And murderers are going to murder. And US govt employees are
	going to come up with laughable excuses for what they do, et
	cetera. 

>I accept this, but for the
> rest of you: thanks for continuing to help us and to support privacy!
> No backdoors. Ever.

yes brother! You've finally proven that jesus rules the universe.
Repetition is the key to truth. Or is it the key to propaganda? 



> 
> --Roger
> 

--Juan


-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

