Delivery-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:29:01 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,
	URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ED791E00C1;
	Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:28:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77862915E;
	Fri, 12 Dec 2014 02:28:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1B3284B5
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 02:28:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 6f67796RMxyY for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 12 Dec 2014 02:28:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-x234.google.com (mail-vc0-x234.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::234])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B148E26464
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 02:28:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id im6so3108269vcb.25
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 18:28:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=QOZyTvKy9M7CPYsKs5HINEZ20wAlUv6xd76LmvzD3v4=;
 b=z4jDDZKjAV9MlVwdcppCDzb9oyOtq0ogooXM1QXQ4r4M6PostCt+dafq2xCe9EuZt5
 6L+lnldXwffAWxCZsu63abOF6xRN9rRtPfQTnSbC8Yyjs4r7lfgAnImQhUfKxy6YaeDq
 H41cYUNyMgj+qt9I6GLEELluqZGIVyW4QAeV3q5pvqix44pCsS6ogjSWu9yhr0gmDxUj
 HTjJ5bMmzKAkKrYQrK4J3Q9ZO2eIAwpwH4Ytye96vjmmyNpLPZMqO6v3BczUbJ6+mZpt
 tzLHyh+mzHuhs5cXNj7DiJwISKh6baOy5KB4dQWlnjSKhGXGYIhX9YqQTpO+iNXJyBwO
 CShA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.36.13 with SMTP id m13mr8114627vdj.55.1418351328111; Thu,
 11 Dec 2014 18:28:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.115.41 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 18:28:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1418339076.20798.3.camel@anglachel>
References: <20141211220732.GG34412@moria.seul.org>
 <CAAS2fgTNWCJcdOq6nd_XJC2e=iPCRxk-a4kiOgxQFnQ+2K8Ahg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1418339076.20798.3.camel@anglachel>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 02:28:48 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgQpDTua_HA6OV2WBqUwd-=kQM2N6Mi4RYCo-Jbm2iq3LQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: "This mailing list is for all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing." <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor and solidarity against online harassment
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Ted Smith <tedks@riseup.net> wrote:
> This sounds like a very flaky reason to be not okay with a denouncement
> of online harassment. You might want to reconsider the communities
> you're a member of, if they have to look for reasons so hard for why a
> commitment against harassment of women on the Internet is such a bad
> thing.

I expressed no view that I had any issue with denouncing harassment.
Without context I'm at a bit of a loss as to what exactly it all
means, but I am certainly not okay with harassment.

I am upset that you thought it appropriate to accuse me (or people I
associate with) of being okay with harassment, simply because I asked
for a clarification that this new (?) intolerance of harassment didn't
extend to undermining prior values.

The statement of support was vague-- how would things change? how was
harassment tolerated before? What can I do to help? etc., no doubt
justifiably in the interest of not exacerbating the problems.

Some people read it as saying that it meant things I was sure it
didn't mean. It was very helpful to get a clarification to help put
people at ease.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

