Delivery-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 18:04:59 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,
	URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17A3A1E0AD9;
	Thu, 11 Dec 2014 18:04:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9941130670;
	Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:04:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A069F2E4BE
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:04:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id wFTWQ1LxaZNN for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:04:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D09D2D704
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:04:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plantcutter.riseup.net (plantcutter-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.121])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEF2841A80
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:04:44 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1418339084; bh=Cc5PQ+BCbErNHbma/ukDecDip607zJIIHSqC2lkb5Yo=;
 h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=ayBN4UZqia564O8ck7DCToASs7PJEh5Rg5ks+I7fAP467UpwBqq5m7/10zX+rGPQQ
 PogsLg3V+xk0hCB73I7KaVSfaEdhXV1PockauPUCStlX/MvRlFHLjYpM3cRWon1vbn
 VKiMnLnIy+VsiSF//28NTHcQiWanxU5fD9JJi/Yo=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: tedks) with ESMTPSA id 8148122603
Message-ID: <1418339076.20798.3.camel@anglachel>
From: Ted Smith <tedks@riseup.net>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 18:04:36 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgTNWCJcdOq6nd_XJC2e=iPCRxk-a4kiOgxQFnQ+2K8Ahg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20141211220732.GG34412@moria.seul.org>
 <CAAS2fgTNWCJcdOq6nd_XJC2e=iPCRxk-a4kiOgxQFnQ+2K8Ahg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at mx1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor and solidarity against online harassment
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0539191524697779769=="
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>


--===============0539191524697779769==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-q1guz/9lwwUX0K2ykRE0"


--=-q1guz/9lwwUX0K2ykRE0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 22:29 +0000, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Roger Dingledine <arma@mit.edu> wrote:
> > I'd like to draw your attention to
> > https://blog.torproject.org/blog/solidarity-against-online-harassment
> > https://twitter.com/torproject/status/543154161236586496
> >
> > One of our colleagues has been the target of a sustained campaign of
> > harassment for the past several months. We have decided to publish this
> > statement to publicly declare our support for her, for every member of
> > our organization, and for every member of our community who experiences
> > this harassment. She is not alone and her experience has catalyzed us t=
o
> > action. This statement is a start.
> >
> > I'd love to get your feedback on this post, and your thoughts on how to
> > turn it into something more. This is a bigger struggle than just Tor's
> > piece of it.
>=20
> The intensity of the language such as "Further, we will no longer hold
> back out of fear or uncertainty from an opportunity to defend a member
> of our community online", immediately caused people in two different
> communities I'm a member of to express concern that this was basically
> a declaration of war and that the Tor Project and the signing parties
> might engage in activities like releasing backdoored software in an
> effort to return fire.
>=20
> I was only able to respond that I didn't think that was the case, but
> nothing in the document provides a strong basis to support that... and
> also pointing out that these people could always be coerced and so
> that risk exists regardless of any statements of intent, and so we
> must audit and count on the auditing of others.

Was "Our commitment to building and promoting strong anonymity
technology is absolute" not good enough?

This sounds like a very flaky reason to be not okay with a denouncement
of online harassment. You might want to reconsider the communities
you're a member of, if they have to look for reasons so hard for why a
commitment against harassment of women on the Internet is such a bad
thing.

--=20
Sent from Ubuntu

--=-q1guz/9lwwUX0K2ykRE0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=nT65
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-q1guz/9lwwUX0K2ykRE0--


--===============0539191524697779769==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

--===============0539191524697779769==--

