Delivery-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:32:46 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 630361E0FF6;
	Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:32:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9E4283B0;
	Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:32:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38683240A0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:32:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id f4weWH58ow2N for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:32:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from khazad-dum.seul.org (khazad-dum.csail.mit.edu [128.31.0.47])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "moria.seul.org", Issuer "moria.seul.org" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A4C22389A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:32:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix, from userid 501)
 id 3FC231E1006; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:32:34 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:32:34 -0500
From: Roger Dingledine <arma@mit.edu>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <20141211223234.GH34412@moria.seul.org>
References: <20141211220732.GG34412@moria.seul.org>
 <CAAS2fgTNWCJcdOq6nd_XJC2e=iPCRxk-a4kiOgxQFnQ+2K8Ahg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgTNWCJcdOq6nd_XJC2e=iPCRxk-a4kiOgxQFnQ+2K8Ahg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10)
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor and solidarity against online harassment
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:29:04PM +0000, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Is there a similarly strong statement that the software will never be
> intentionally backdoored by the same parties that I can point people
> to?  I don't wish to deflect from the serious concern about online
> harassment, but it seems this statement can easily be misconstrued
> (perhaps maliciously) as a statement of abandoning prior values.

You might like
https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq#Backdoor

We won't put backdoors in Tor. Ever.

Thanks,
--Roger

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

