Delivery-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:23:18 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2843C1E0FE0;
	Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:23:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D662286D7;
	Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:23:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068E428492
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:23:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id utACzUcUn6wy for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:23:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.196])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE7AF2848E
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:23:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from Zakat (h130.234.90.75.dynamic.ip.windstream.net [75.90.234.130])
 by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mreueus003) with ESMTP (Nemesis)
 id 0M25vh-1XfQaa3zat-00u5G6; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:23:05 +0100
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:23:02 -0500
From: Rocky_Tor <Tor@denstarfarm.us>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v6.7.2) Professional
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <1086711481.20141211152302@denstarfarm.us>
To: usprey <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOmikWEMf_V2QsStuk-5iPYzEQWS4155vF06ngFK-+Hf0i4ULA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1102204713.20141211085226@denstarfarm.us> 
 <CAOmikWFGAiQSRpuAF1ymByKK7ZY0tqs7n13Z+6FPwoCFvOEdJw@mail.gmail.com>
 <154213127.20141211102946@denstarfarm.us>
 <CAOmikWEMf_V2QsStuk-5iPYzEQWS4155vF06ngFK-+Hf0i4ULA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:b3imHw/fvrCS5qDgyR62WtSZNoQXK6EhyUgIqkE3dHf
 hHsUdTG7rN7p62E2vYIbov/MzaxMTAhxTZhTUmGmiJ0uj/3PTw
 M9aPsKNjH3Ro+dvqXwu10Nx2c4KBgBVrzgYpxS4w7cdwG1pm67
 TiL2zqD1UeTPuzz2Y/S7UnwQZ5yyStt+LwDPRA/HTHOaf87SHC
 g7+B+4jfDDWYbkJtADfKCMETyuUnBuTlL/8dBtJrjQM9oqJmkt
 axwFzVGa4Q9LpwITsIEoTA3m18Rk86/VdNRySXIa5WMY3gHbh/
 eGuG3Iiciz8KMit72bglI+7wj3ET+3ZLLhmxmNczTP0Dk57VDP
 gJ9eU11aTXwWpQP8IK0YFwDCbN+3gC0e0MGU27Anz
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] URL Addressing
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Hello usprey,

> Inline below.


> Check. per the default exit policy:

> reject 169.254.0.0/16:*
> reject 127.0.0.0/8:*
> reject 192.168.0.0/16:*
> reject 10.0.0.0/8:*
> reject 172.16.0.0/12:*

> no exits allow access to their local addresses.

and:
> Please see forwarded messages from tor-relays below.
>
> Summary:
> The problem: A user suspects interference with traffic on exit connections.
>
> Users ad-hoc solution: The user has defined his own (too short?) list of
> trusted exits.
>
> Proposed long-term solution: Use existing web of trust systems
> .... [snip]

many many thanks for the informative reply. NOW I see why I shouldn't
have been willy-nilly allowed to exit to my router, and so forth.

I should find a Tor-List designed for the less-informed User and not tie
this one up. Is there such?

thanks!








>  If you were to use an exit

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

