Delivery-Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 11:11:47 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL,
	DKIM_SIGNED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DED731E0443;
	Sat, 29 Aug 2015 11:11:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6656C37455;
	Sat, 29 Aug 2015 15:11:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CF937448
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 15:11:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 0ok1rcQms4ih for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat, 29 Aug 2015 15:11:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail2.openmailbox.org (mail2.openmailbox.org [62.4.1.33])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61577371BE
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 15:11:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 1004)
 id 7EF732AC2D8A; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 17:11:34 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org;
 s=openmailbox; t=1440861094;
 bh=18t2NBP2N1GJDXzAQR70Z5R3nq2B4JykZebtns80QqE=;
 h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=p1PPvq8JdMrFb74jeKZQc7Xc/m3Z29YKYR1++4Zi5BJvwLoZc3Lz+o8T/uEmN/wI4
 elVuf/3ffhKfAnbzi3+4QsYlf3Yw7MxucMSFP62bnb1DGCqpM6mwPDRvj/uPUMDYAU
 9OP5pIiZN70X7ZwIKq8CiaYGFyp+iYoOETY6smcs=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org;
 s=openmailbox; t=1440861084;
 bh=18t2NBP2N1GJDXzAQR70Z5R3nq2B4JykZebtns80QqE=;
 h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=EpyOvzEkoCxEaqCH1s4TX2U9EtpRUia4WLm3UDh50ZfKJ/BSZsY7vk60uKOQQK8jQ
 ElG3ikTmvXDaKyYvitqaRM/4fAzk06WWJfKRCIWogkgQAkiCTbdPm/dOljusKfiGjM
 lv3A89tMWcah/BG23u8pVYZdWI90WQskUkcerlaA=
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <ca+qhdt6ben1a=rfg6sv5=pfgbxe5mvvyuspqj3pz1mnuqutz0q@mail.gmail.com>
 <BD3D56BEF90.00000522beatthebastards@inbox.com>
 <20150828165643.GC2232@ix.local>
From: blaatenator <blaatenator@openmailbox.org>
Message-ID: <55E1CB9B.4050507@openmailbox.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 17:11:23 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:40.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/40.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150828165643.GC2232@ix.local>
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] (no subject)
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Indeed, some (coincidentally???) big corps do block relays. For a while
I ran a relay from my home connection and for instance Nike was not
reachable without the use of a VPN (I don't mind, and even favor, Nike
being out of the picture, not everyone feels the same way ;) ).


On 28-08-15 18:56, Rejo Zenger wrote:
> ++ 23/08/15 15:59 -0800 - I:
>>> Beware though that running a Tor Relay from your home connection is
>>> discouraged: https://www.torproject.org/eff/tor-legal-faq.html.en
>> Running an exit from home is discouraged not a middle relay.
>>
>> Less fearmongering might help expand Tor.
> Reality is a thing of nuance: although the risks of running a middle 
> relay from home are for more limited compared to running an exit relay 
> from home, there are some things that should be taken into account.
>
> Most notably: the IP-address from your home connection will be listed in 
> one or more block lists, based on the criteria that these lists list all 
> none Tor relays. This may be a problem when site owners decided to deny 
> traffic from IP-addresses that are running a Tor relay. As a result of 
> that, if you run a middle relay from home, you may have difficulties 
> reaching some sites.
>
>
>
>

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

