Delivery-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 14:15:15 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05E7B1E0BD4;
	Fri, 28 Aug 2015 14:15:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3493620D;
	Fri, 28 Aug 2015 18:15:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7207361D9
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 18:15:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id raPwO2Y0fgNR for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 28 Aug 2015 18:15:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ig0-x235.google.com (mail-ig0-x235.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::235])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0D2336120
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 18:15:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igyq3 with SMTP id q3so18400252igy.1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 11:15:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=ipKwwyUny5RMWsiPfiWBxmR8/JyqSqGHOUd09uffooE=;
 b=krzJwUj0KcZ8hJ0WEXRVchPnN+N05bPAIGOcYOuL+gmu4v2vZSYC36dli+ha4kM2M/
 zY94rK6OGz0ME6KkAaTL9KnuWR1SvERLsWsVOLst1tu32dmOXExrm81t09cwYreiFhi3
 Dr5+pfmN83vxc0O+PiB6SXaORYAMqczdNyvC6JtNI5Hs7boIf+zBhkDTfaGqSnSKhYgF
 lNRC06U6zgz1sfcCB5lVcc5tr0DEv0wkZSTzhKMhLgA/NtNHyQZJR6LZ10cO7Mchc5If
 ZRHOp3BfQdo6jD1/rvqvb0Mc3k3+qgOPaSkzdK5uvZNg+pvFWGTxpONjqnwFaTfKLCC3
 Qv+g==
X-Received: by 10.50.122.36 with SMTP id lp4mr4790915igb.37.1440785702506;
 Fri, 28 Aug 2015 11:15:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.36.104.202 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 11:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHKdp-naN+=P6sc8tjCip-p4KJ9220JGfGy8aPMd7OV3qTTM+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD2Ti2-BVgv+KEPwYytJr_GgfvPRv0is+ZjR2WYev7R_0q3jsA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHKdp-naN+=P6sc8tjCip-p4KJ9220JGfGy8aPMd7OV3qTTM+Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 14:14:43 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD2Ti29BoEu7JVk+pruRyeb3aMN4EqgU_e771T8GdW_GbaV91Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Cc: cypherpunks@cpunks.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] M.Hearn adds privacy depriority to Bitcoin XT,
 calls your Tor/Proxy/etc use "unimportant"
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Sean Lynch <seanl@literati.org> wrote:
>> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010379.html
>> https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt/commit/73c9efe74c5cc8faea9c2b2c785a2f5b68aa4c23

> you're mischaracterizing it
> Please specify how that is "misleading" or "downplaying."

No, go read and ask the former link's author from where it
was directly quoted to specify.

> say so

Ok, it's bullshit. Not least of which because Tor's measly
1000 exits are nothing in comparison to genuine "dDoS"
by significant actors against Bitcoin, let alone the load
from a million normal lusers and their lesser infected PC's,
and everyone's tools they're using to interface with BTC.
Nor will Tor amount to anything when banks and nation
states start to get scared and attack digital currencies.
Where's the blocking code for that and their IP ranges?
You'll be lucky if users amount to anything there either.
And the internet has already characterized Mike's
seemingly apparent anti-privacy and corporate modes,
but I'll let the net continue to sort that out.
Happy now? ;)

Tor users are humans too and as such hold the same rights
as everyone else. Anyone who thinks otherwise can fuck off.


> The feature is very clearly described on the BitcoinXT web site, and you're
> mischaracterizing it by saying BitcoinXT downloads the list "for
> blacklisting." It is a DoS protection feature that ONLY comes into play
> under overload. And yes, BitcoinXT considers Tor connections "less
> important" than non-anonymous connections during attacks. You may not agree
> that that's a good heuristic, but if that's your problem with it, say so.
> From https://bitcoinxt.software/patches.html:
> ...
> Please specify how that is "misleading" or "downplaying."
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

