Delivery-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:35:57 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 194DD1E12CA;
	Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:35:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A243636F3D;
	Thu, 27 Aug 2015 04:35:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EE636F3A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 04:35:46 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id NPR7_NA6AttA for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 27 Aug 2015 04:35:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::230])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A54A36F33
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 04:35:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by widdq5 with SMTP id dq5so32688731wid.0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 21:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=E7zZ9ddHAInMkVDwaMJHEYc70vFtjfD3c2nBPWzOS/M=;
 b=UK/lE5xra2blx03rDSn2KxOE4BoPL7ld7pYh7D2J09VS+EBQCdTem3Og9hWFCT52U7
 6Q1kSJ7d7THy+tdKyPzYmsmTntg2iv+Zu94gvlPRpBOF5UH/DBEnaHkIN9rQSL9WrPpu
 uRLNkkGUrdf0ac59hf9PjLVzoSrKiE/fQ9Bx7Ad2JhxjzedpRpCtNS0F4REdS43EqAKo
 n+BMWv0qCZK08N1miSE8uAz0rB35GqRr5ephFx3KUVDqleBa1vnC8wfHM69ADY+gRe1s
 XZfF202qG3iMZhrcINBT2A3ieySUGp8OQYWQqwUBAi6pJKkoaj4HdFx6BNnNVPv9d6Pi
 SOpA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.11.176 with SMTP id r16mr16259083wib.87.1440650143646;
 Wed, 26 Aug 2015 21:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.96.137 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 21:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAD2Ti2-KE9YgSkn0dDvb_kUhJqnuThZCxcGD8ptSynfOPUFkDw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD2Ti2-KE9YgSkn0dDvb_kUhJqnuThZCxcGD8ptSynfOPUFkDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 06:35:43 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKkunMb2yFRcw+Pev56jc3rA7F3bn3bb9bLjHd87Sep5bo+FqQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anders Andersson <pipatron@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] IBM says Block Tor
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

I couldn't find what they mean with "the Netherlands is home to the
largest number of non-malicious and malicious nodes combined" in
Figure 1 on page 8. What differentiate a "malicious node" from a
"non-malicious node"?

Otherwise it wasn't that bad, but the last paragraph is quite offensive:

"In general, networks should be configured to deny access to websites
such as www.torproject.org"


On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:51 AM, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/wg/en/wgl03086usen/WGL03086USEN.PDF
>
> IBM Advises Businesses To Block Tor
>
> With Tor-based attacks on the rise, IBM says it's time to stop Tor in
> the enterprise.
>
> New data from IBM's X-Force research team shows steady increase in SQL
> injection and distributed denial-of-service attacks as well as
> vulnerability reconnaissance activity via the Tor anonymizing service.
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

