Delivery-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 16:24:46 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3237F1E1059;
	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 16:24:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58FDD365D2;
	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 20:24:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A50C364B0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 20:24:33 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id PmPkB-Cc_CKe for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon, 24 Aug 2015 20:24:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-x236.google.com (mail-ob0-x236.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::236])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 188BB36475
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 20:24:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by obbwr7 with SMTP id wr7so124186769obb.2
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
 bh=nQyiLNTP8VZJY4k42vctq0JV1XCNGIAG1a/4plNeEdw=;
 b=qL4Z8M4iGY9m5CvyzyE57XgGTFxrDl2IzDX7hMV9XU5VwzYk+CykDpi+Nnvm4GAII2
 SiYMAMXEmBe3D74fpXi2yRnclzIjdDS8reVfVuMWkmw7J3zNgBKa9ulJrpgJW4HqMAC7
 DjZlYQF71oHzfit62zAOHk01varhOe1iqJMsNrza0f2e0lMRpFyg0CGSC8U0R5zv+bvp
 Q0HpMoPKThQGghqqoo6WXJ8f2o5Z8KlANo/BUILP9SKiT3D7axvA1W7UsDSAoMWJKQnZ
 cuYEhGO4LpXclqTY5P9pA7ZEyaB+EOu49ANgluQikxLFQnEva4+MIFRs/dxaGhIBv4aA
 RATQ==
X-Received: by 10.60.176.104 with SMTP id ch8mr23720500oec.82.1440447870823;
 Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.115.166 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ryan Carboni <ryacko@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:23:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CAO7N=i0Gu=qsfu_LaurT=64eRiVJ+Gx9Cz-ONtKKAx5ffSdxuQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] What's to be Done
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

> > I'm curious if any one on the list is able to determine how many of the
> above issues have already been addressed by the OpenBSD project.
> I don't want to steer the thread away from the main topic but I think it is
> fair to say that OpenBSD has problems too. An article titled the insecurity
> of OpenBSD is a good read if you are interested.



I'm somewhat excited for new developments in the internet of things.
The development of a $9 computer means that while for a long time one
could achieve government grade cryptographic security, it isn't until
recently that you could achieve the duplication of computers to ensure
segregation and security (on a reasonable budget). The recent
malvertising attack stealing any files named "pass" or "passw*" shows
that security can only be done by doing things by hand.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

