Delivery-Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:52:16 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB6EE1E03D2;
	Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:52:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3668136242;
	Sun, 23 Aug 2015 21:52:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC193622E
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 21:52:05 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id NyakJx07wep9 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun, 23 Aug 2015 21:52:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail0.babylon.network (mail0.babylon.network
 [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:4480::215])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D837133A67
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 21:52:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (mail0.babylon.network [127.0.0.1])
 by mail0.babylon.network (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC754203C0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 23:52:02 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=babylon.network;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type
 :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:date:message-id
 :organization:from:from:to:references:subject:subject:reply-to;
 s=dkim; t=1440366716; x=1442958717; bh=udaH41IvpuGK3mtPdQVCoZc7
 lmCzPvdFhbifXXZQXDg=; b=rejEZL11HKPFnZAzgbH2V9c4BRLOysFTgh2tnozd
 xcDBQ2y3l3pU7qNx2qN5o0pbjC7qoPfEeOCX+QS3S3PtOZrymY3f8xBSxNfk5vnC
 IiwdLPcpV/USjtbE+C/f7X2OZlErNBTcqT27WQRcMBdKSl7ro1g0BQazpv/dQhf/
 Z2E=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail0.babylon.network
Received: from mail0.babylon.network ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail0.babylon.network [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id CRC5o5Ic6RC8 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun, 23 Aug 2015 23:51:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from BBLN.local (5ED0759E.cm-7-1b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [94.208.117.158])
 by mail0.babylon.network (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93A77420328
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 23:51:56 +0200 (CEST)
References: <CA+QhdT6Ben1A=rfG6Sv5=pFGBxE5mvVyUspQJ3pZ1mNuQUtZ0Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
From: NOC <noc@babylon.network>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Organization: Babylon Network
Message-ID: <55DA407C.80301@babylon.network>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 23:51:56 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+QhdT6Ben1A=rfG6Sv5=pFGBxE5mvVyUspQJ3pZ1mNuQUtZ0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] (no subject)
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

As the Tor Relay software does not fully utilize multiple cores yet
the use of the parallel processing power is not that big. It might
help a bit but not as you would love to see it.

The choice is yours.

Beware though that running a Tor Relay from your home connection is
discouraged: https://www.torproject.org/eff/tor-legal-faq.html.en

On 8/23/15 10:52 PM, Naseem Dillman-Hasso wrote:
> Hello, I have the ability to get a parallel processing computer. I
> was wondering if this would help run a tor relay faster, or if a
> regular computer works just as fast. Thanks so much.
> 

- -- 
Tim Semeijn
Babylon Network

PGP: 0x2A540FA5 / 3DF3 13FA 4B60 E48A E755 9663 B187 0310 2A54 0FA5
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJV2kB7AAoJELGHAxAqVA+lDkgP/A1UAvZmnykFhmDik1W/J62v
ARW/pP4KcGtP3oX03lggSti70J00NDGd3yy1YSeChi/KklHXU2y4dhp0VPQE1Sut
IhMownEa/p4T9ZV9lnJg6Nh5ITCHP4lrUz586XLgBvFAWkF73JVF8zjlfVwBx6xl
Lx49s06Rl238qA5F6fC5Xcg8i7T2jFWaLbU5nEt6PY1TIx/8r5Fw+cYDiiR2smW2
AGQs6XKZLctoBnXeM+6Cm2ip2KopPMPdPBkcPrlU9PvmEy95qpy5tTyGejKuoQfP
evpYm1Y+TWD6FRvHf+I8UOXthLryx5o+jHN9jQn0t8H6SPaDSl5EYo/K8F8WQRcd
0mDcbDRR2662EqMwt0aZxWiMdBCpXm/XapJdXBn4LqwYPL4J8V48qb9RfiHy6Js+
rlmpJxYlAy+qNE6GsPT5Z3Sn9/YKVFa84E4AZxKi+ij9vKDnEu2EJ67r2OckWtEC
9WXF6sxgFyO4DF6TNrRe8NlKjl+E0HtLl+Y6EoDOoCiNabZ3qMe4tEjLf5E3qC5u
t/7AAJ/YvUW5JmhHXSEmllKB71POuUVwvUPeQBSUvraxKP+0E9cjBKQFEUkjHsrf
HSXDiVbgWZLoTKcIKDyiIceXy490oquR5zSzW/Em37kCqjW3Q2xLVILdVKJ8ENKn
X+3E97iVDnHySKhySjFt
=sWyn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

