Delivery-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 02:53:11 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3BF61E0A79;
	Mon,  3 Aug 2015 02:53:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0174E332F4;
	Mon,  3 Aug 2015 06:53:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD7B33259
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  3 Aug 2015 06:53:03 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id ppNTZGgktahU for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon,  3 Aug 2015 06:53:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from khazad-dum.seul.org (khazad-dum.csail.mit.edu [128.31.0.47])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "moria.seul.org", Issuer "moria.seul.org" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 250D526C1B
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  3 Aug 2015 06:53:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix, from userid 501)
 id E27A31E0A79; Mon,  3 Aug 2015 02:52:59 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 02:52:59 -0400
From: Roger Dingledine <arma@mit.edu>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <20150803065259.GO7945@moria.seul.org>
References: <CAPkfgVY5-gUNFb4KgVLcRYDpXSJnJLkydOhw9bJB-YAJ+4UbrA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPkfgVY5-gUNFb4KgVLcRYDpXSJnJLkydOhw9bJB-YAJ+4UbrA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10)
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Circuit Fingerprinting Attacks: Passive
 Deanonymization of Tor Hidden Services
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 08:50:54AM +0200, Jon Tullett wrote:
> Looks interesting. Has anyone reviewed it?
> 
> http://people.csail.mit.edu/devadas/pubs/circuit_finger.pdf
> http://anongalactic.com/new-attack-on-tor-can-deanonymize-hidden-services-with-surprising-accuracy/

Hi Jon,

Yes. I wrote about it here:

https://blog.torproject.org/blog/technical-summary-usenix-fingerprinting-paper

(That text is actually a part of the Ars article that you quote above.)

--Roger

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

