Delivery-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:46:13 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL,
	DKIM_SIGNED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C27D81E0510;
	Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:46:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95DCF3648C;
	Thu, 20 Aug 2015 04:46:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4433642E
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 04:46:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id G2l-YOUIuzL4 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 20 Aug 2015 04:46:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp4.openmailbox.org (smtp4.openmailbox.org [62.4.1.38])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0D8E3642D
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 04:46:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 1004)
 id 424602AC1239; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 06:45:57 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org;
 s=openmailbox; t=1440045958;
 bh=pcG+v60iqhWc0zLvXyBOYqGhEQ5YLaUFafDh+xO/Xaw=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:From;
 b=eUg/gx3CAYiRX3q0BnLUmfZPk1VYYTeGZp4ZA8CIpLDEHjlGGy2edHRlXzF+JyZ1Y
 99+yXjJsQj30KeC/bFxT5to44qe/Etc9RTXhf/ZDGFu7l6dccEup+l+Nio68pDgv6Z
 ba6nx4/oOeJAqJGM7JFeS4RFtrty4WQy32ccIfRg=
Received: from www.openmailbox.org (openmailbox-b2 [10.91.69.220])
 by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422ED2AC1280
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 06:45:52 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: mail2.openmailbox.org; dkim=none
 reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=fail (unprotected policy);
 dkim-atps=neutral
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 21:45:52 -0700
From: spencerone@openmailbox.org
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <fdbaddc851152d16ab247c91864bfd1a@openmailbox.org>
X-Sender: spencerone@openmailbox.org
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.6
Subject: [tor-talk] M.Hearn adds privacy depriority to Bitcoin XT,
 calls your Tor/Proxy/etc use "unimportant"
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

> grarpamp:
> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010379.html
> https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt/commit/73c9efe74c5cc8faea9c2b2c785a2f5b68aa4c23
> 
> Bitcoin XT contains an unmentioned addition which periodically 
> downloads
> lists of Tor IP addresses for blacklisting, this has considerable 
> privacy
> implications for hapless users which are being prompted to use the
> software. The feature is not clearly described, is enabled by default,
> and has a switch name which intentionally downplays what it is doing
> (disableipprio). Furthermore these claimed anti-DoS measures are
> trivially bypassed and so offer absolutely no protection whatsoever.
> 

Damn 75%ers!

Wordlife,
Spencer

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

