Delivery-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:15:40 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AFDC1E0510;
	Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:15:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5011364B4;
	Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:15:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF97C3645B
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:15:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id R73MhY9s2YN2 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:15:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22b.google.com (mail-oi0-x22b.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22b])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4CA035A17
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:15:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by oiev193 with SMTP id v193so9241665oie.3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 12:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=F4O378nYvZOkAuf7fjWUWDY59/tG2K/HI7/UzLNyb60=;
 b=qqZFQtvyOMDJaPkjSBgMno7NK5/DYJCWG9NuEFgpSVSL5Ucugcz3akAPPmWVTUtwHe
 fwR/C4AvH3xGoHnQFOq8lD2FbpC51Jq+1O5ayA04LioO4uudomwvKEip/Ooj+QaDkE84
 cbIHF+O8n/bKBpIakER3fFEcOVQEBBoQB2Wgbs47UbzQFkoGUM0LQQ2D0ORzRVxkOHJs
 SXhIcUSW/6scg6V4B6HJCr4BglbUJDDUcYL6U5Md/LoYyP2nYar3rYNX5oakxpMhrAVT
 jwccFtvep/WiMp6MVK7w/QjkC41mlvIXc7I/mDXvhWYR4DVhQotbf7Ev9CqhytB92O4J
 aaeQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.71.10 with SMTP id u10mr11537265oia.108.1440011720593;
 Wed, 19 Aug 2015 12:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.219.9 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 12:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <B1166FAC-2BB1-4FFD-A391-5D7E2A5231F5@fb.com>
References: <55D45D3B.3070401@infosecurity.ch>
 <20150819173452.GT9483@mail2.eff.org>
 <B1166FAC-2BB1-4FFD-A391-5D7E2A5231F5@fb.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 21:15:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKkunMYk82LfYZ5SDC8ZrAxWFJm5m5c_G3=mXYcViY86zAehYQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anders Andersson <pipatron@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Letsencrypt and Tor Hidden Services
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Alec Muffett <alecm@fb.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, I'm Alec, and I am co-author of the Onion RFC draft with Jacob Appelbaum.
>
> Reports of the bogging-down have been greatly exaggerated, and I wish people would stop repeating them.
>
> The status of the Onion RFC draft is viewable at:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld/
>
> ...and this afternoon I created some amendments to the draft to address IETF and IANA concerns, and have circulated them amongst the team (me, Jake, Mark) to see if I've goofed.
>
> We will merge them, soon, in good time for the next review.
>
> In the most recent review IANA in particular were very helpful, offering to rewrite some of their stuff in order to make it abundantly clear to CA/B-Forum that:
>
> 1) onion will be a special case
> 2) onion should never be delegated
> 3) but nonetheless SSL certificates should be issued for it
>
> ...which proactively addresses a concern from a few months back re: whether CA/B-Forum would nitpick a "Special Use" designation.
>
> TL;DR - we are not past the finish line yet, and there is work to be done and challenge, but we're not down nor are we out.
> --
> Alec Muffett
> Security Infrastructure
> Facebook Engineering
> London

Just wanted to  thank you for this work, I hope you succeed!

/ Anders
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

