Delivery-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 17:11:49 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE8791E04BA;
	Fri,  1 Aug 2014 17:11:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E3D30C21;
	Fri,  1 Aug 2014 21:11:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32AB630BB4
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  1 Aug 2014 21:11:40 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 8DawmSK3-pWL for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri,  1 Aug 2014 21:11:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.bitmessage.ch (mail.bitmessage.ch [146.228.112.252])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8EB030B08
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  1 Aug 2014 21:11:39 +0000 (UTC)
dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=bitmessage.ch; s=mail;
 c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt;
 h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:References;
 bh=1bmPUHSWwIoXLOgiYGXMe1NTxDKbovFNtaWl8gA0pCQ=;
 b=hZVMufxluKQYAv8yjUKToNsxmtsopyYvzegRYYTxFazhNIxmIKf8KTEbsPQp0N1tgGNOdb1yIvljK+2d46mx80T8KVeeEun+6FPH2ySwFF5e/0zO1SwsNVZaEqzMWVMBYB9useo7cM+TGwt6aQqy+X1nr1ju4xUPSxhJHlwO+wI=
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (BITMESSAGE [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bitmessage.ch
 ; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 23:11:19 +0200
Message-ID: <53DC0281.3020808@bitmessage.ch>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 21:11:29 +0000
From: Nusenu <BM-2D8wMEVgGVY76je1WXNPfo8SrpZt5yGHES@bitmessage.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <53D980B1.9020009@bitmessage.ch>
 <20140731002741.GB16023@nymity.ch> <53DA9757.2050602@bitmessage.ch>
 <20140731201233.GA23456@nymity.ch> <20140731203519.GF8819@moria.seul.org>
 <CAJdkzEMCf8tc3phdckJhUq0sz0VkGd8oXSGTWJ2OEVfAJpgQHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <53DBDA4A.5010008@bitmessage.ch>
 <CAJdkzEPVj0uniR3b7-pkzFj7XHoxKwciif6-0vzJ0PQyG3XAxg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJdkzEPVj0uniR3b7-pkzFj7XHoxKwciif6-0vzJ0PQyG3XAxg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Why make bad-relays a closed mailing list?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

>>> Does anyone want to argue against making who we flag and why 
>>> public?
>> 
>> Would be great to also hear about
>> 
>> "Does anyone want to argue against making who we reject 
>> (AuthDirReject) and why public?" (if the above question doesn't
>> include that already)
> 
> It does. Rejection is just another scenario of flagging a bad
> relay. I see no point in discussing rejection separately.

Great, thanks for clarifying this point.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=65xb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

