Delivery-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 02:19:26 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 374041E0302;
	Thu,  7 Aug 2014 02:19:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17AF220E92;
	Thu,  7 Aug 2014 06:19:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E308727024
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu,  7 Aug 2014 06:19:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 2mjQZCaMYY8D for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu,  7 Aug 2014 06:19:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from jessica.everdot.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:1c12::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFA6820E92
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu,  7 Aug 2014 06:19:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.everdot.org (primail.everdot.org [IPv6:2001:470:dc2e:5::2])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by jessica.everdot.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A0B2FA08F9
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu,  7 Aug 2014 08:19:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.everdot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BB59122DAE
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu,  7 Aug 2014 08:19:11 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at everdot.org
Received: from mail.everdot.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (everdot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id FaM9p7pJmOZO for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu,  7 Aug 2014 08:19:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from meilong (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:dc2e:2:51f7:eaef:67ac:f9c9])
 (using SSLv3 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.everdot.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56CB19122C5F
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu,  7 Aug 2014 08:19:05 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 08:18:55 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?B?1nl2aW5k?= Saether <oyvinds@everdot.org>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <20140807081855.1b285380@meilong>
In-Reply-To: <53E14A49.2090709@cpunk.us>
References: <53E14A49.2090709@cpunk.us>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Is there a benefit to using the .onion address over
 a clearnet one?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1566217061289688848=="
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

--===============1566217061289688848==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
 boundary="Sig_/B43WSHVZYY7xf/vURUKIGSS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"

--Sig_/B43WSHVZYY7xf/vURUKIGSS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> I use a service that provides both a clearnet address and an onion
> address. I only access this service through Tor and I usually do it
> via the clearnet address. Are there any benefits to accessing such a
> service via its onion address?

Tor location hidden services have end-to-end encryption. If the site
you are abusing has a http:// clearnet address then you get more
end-to-end security by using the .onion address instead.=20

Also, the exit node you are using can see someone visiting the site in
question. This is also avoided if you use the .onion variant.

--Sig_/B43WSHVZYY7xf/vURUKIGSS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlPjGlYACgkQNBSJHnwv/KqJpwCgulOOVzfJ/WftOwqGqBU2ZSjQ
q0EAnjjjkag+EglqqZoOoCLlx7bGi/yw
=kcDm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/B43WSHVZYY7xf/vURUKIGSS--

--===============1566217061289688848==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

--===============1566217061289688848==--

