Delivery-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 16:43:29 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C5F21E04AD;
	Fri,  1 Aug 2014 16:43:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC9430BF7;
	Fri,  1 Aug 2014 20:43:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8985B30BC1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  1 Aug 2014 20:43:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 0LHdxrHDw6q1 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri,  1 Aug 2014 20:43:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22a.google.com (mail-ob0-x22a.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DA2B30B8A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  1 Aug 2014 20:43:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id wp4so2971931obc.15
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 13:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
 :from:to:content-type;
 bh=pK1TC3EhIyyPDEJj7/lkqChc3SOHaps9Lx8whJyNo24=;
 b=GiYbENN90iOYTY3w9W1wvJZ4lv3DSAmUwxxKXmn4UzAklr59BVjbT5RXYfrbybHj9u
 eqSkjApR2OBZ2zE2LCucgurwiOcat2/VjPanO6OUf+xRSXUmBZAuymLe/rvo1jibPJOn
 +SZHAkcns9DnVW1TKiLpvfM61tHXv9p25GHivrgkWw3Lkfk9hKWWuu3IQWIDQey3k5/O
 5W5sw9cF28HtYYH4uv9haRVNJODRKcOfP32aEBToFSs9C6XM5hWgjW+vjL8nO9vYP15R
 iMQI0OUOUPaUVV8WLSgxL5TCpmdIcwzrTZEYULwkWae5gFO9gcP/f4ag0ynG1Jevg5k4
 t1OA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.96.200 with SMTP id du8mr12037887oeb.74.1406925796175;
 Fri, 01 Aug 2014 13:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.224.84 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 13:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53DBDA4A.5010008@bitmessage.ch>
References: <53D980B1.9020009@bitmessage.ch> <20140731002741.GB16023@nymity.ch>
 <53DA9757.2050602@bitmessage.ch> <20140731201233.GA23456@nymity.ch>
 <20140731203519.GF8819@moria.seul.org>
 <CAJdkzEMCf8tc3phdckJhUq0sz0VkGd8oXSGTWJ2OEVfAJpgQHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <53DBDA4A.5010008@bitmessage.ch>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 13:43:16 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: oQH10pqBALeAti5fpQmiYp2iWbM
Message-ID: <CAJdkzEPVj0uniR3b7-pkzFj7XHoxKwciif6-0vzJ0PQyG3XAxg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Damian Johnson <atagar@torproject.org>
To: Tor Mailing List <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Why make bad-relays a closed mailing list?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

>> Does anyone want to argue against making who we flag and why
>> public?
>
> Would be great to also hear about
>
> "Does anyone want to argue against making who we reject
> (AuthDirReject) and why public?"
> (if the above question doesn't include that already)

It does. Rejection is just another scenario of flagging a bad relay. I
see no point in discussing rejection separately.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

