Delivery-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 21:40:33 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 355B21E0C77;
	Mon,  4 Aug 2014 21:40:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1402FCBB;
	Tue,  5 Aug 2014 01:40:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694F02FC73
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  5 Aug 2014 01:40:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id Fh6pFeX0aTxZ for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue,  5 Aug 2014 01:40:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25F602F71A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  5 Aug 2014 01:40:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ho1so443141wib.10
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 18:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=O4hDsY/PUzRFGAhhNv75iKNSCqapK2FyaFHkiY9CdyU=;
 b=nFfgILb/KuFR2tVr5YcegEdNmq1fw8GxlRnfpZ21egJDgD4gQoSg85CDBTCkSPDKZY
 Y95q83NZK7b3ti9vHyuQY3zCM5YtNsEVhDUKBI3HC7m0nQW01uNqC7GWAwktyROOAEyy
 vAVom9qQibWs58IzdAoHfwlo04vLMGyKiKl+37dryo3QXcrIUYZDv6lX3g1tC5q8ElIQ
 tzlUc/uHGG9FAKQAui3mN+HUdvMQbYq9OiIAGQ8ohBH6xdvbe1IP1QiryCM0fYVquVvr
 lQFIlCa18wDtGN2pLTh7Rbz1g9k5Se819KEIizxgE6e+FMlvjeniKSbsA0+tGGAJAzjx
 qtGw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.21.141 with SMTP id v13mr35801489wie.48.1407202818012;
 Mon, 04 Aug 2014 18:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.221.12 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 18:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 10:40:17 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKMgAkTDBMBnOksQ7U_xdOnOwXBbpoxDBAQZD=jm4_j=smQZbA@mail.gmail.com>
From: saurav dahal <dahal.saurav@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [tor-talk] Why adding Guard-Exit (EE) node in Tor yeild more catch
 probability than adding guard and exit node separately?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

I am trying to observe the catch probability i.e. probability that a client
selects my added guard as well as exit node while making a circuit.

First I inserted certain number of guard nodes and certain number of exit
nodes in Tor network and performed the simulation in Shadow simulator.
After completion of simulation, I calculated the catch probability.

Then again I added the same number of Guard-Exit (EE) node and perform the
simulation and calculated the probability.

I found that catch probability for EE nodes are much higher than those of
guard and exit node separately.

Could anyone please explain why this happened?

-- 

Saurav
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

