Delivery-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:54:53 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95EDE1E0ABC;
	Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:54:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B63830C13;
	Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:54:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD83530C13
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:54:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id CLZuXL1Kufpg for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:54:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com (mail-pa0-x235.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92EA830C03
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:54:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id fa1so10379082pad.26
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
 :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=H93yvbsDEWsasRCGuAsqNnn4xhkX5TgpZzhU5X3gttk=;
 b=o6phK1E+XJ+8+BZ+LePRgGHwfHYnH1yBG2RoUjP2O+OplYLzszTWQx9BOoXN8WaQr1
 cXtgi4KRmbhkjB3PlfHksN7gHEtspgW2luaASuL70gXvD4M02+JikCjUH5gqOYNTN+U5
 JKZ5iQDfGNkC844Ed6j/KSOVu+SNZaA3xNrYpyrlFqeNFvwmuKtnAefIhad9tjKWvVfE
 pw92waR4eseN1SUk+rBU/EtlyR7HC8FqNPjX3YWcPeoxPLKV1zS08ynNY0d8m1TSw7p3
 wSz0hK8vlr23tbNP4A3IzJZUCt4HRt8I0eafUgivwZexZl+xUu013WR2y7GvIIzHpAW1
 zeog==
X-Received: by 10.66.221.38 with SMTP id qb6mr5419580pac.125.1409518480119;
 Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.116] (ip174-65-118-27.sd.sd.cox.net. [174.65.118.27])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id or4sm9129057pdb.19.2014.08.31.13.54.38
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <54038B85.8030806@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:54:29 -0700
From: Charles Thomas <awesomepossumcraft@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <mailman.13.1409486402.9061.tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.13.1409486402.9061.tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] tor-talk Digest, Vol 43, Issue 67
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

As long as the current guard model is in place then the relay could
probably tell if its a client vs bridge by the frequency of visit. I'm
assuming that a client visits one of its guard more often on average
then a random bridge would connect to that guard. There is probably
something in the code that tells the node which spot they are in.

The network would be slightly less secure because the chances of
having the first and last node would be improved, making correlation
attacks easier. It would how ever not be a third easier though,
because of Guards and exits wouldn't be used (much) as a middle node.

On 08/31/2014 05:00 AM, tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUA4t0AAoJEDsKeXBBl7wEwMkQAIBUxRPzMiXGb8y3U8vgD9F0
2naI5aI6b5g5rTM94F2fe7I1Xmi1v8W+L3NdK4m/7TJImdBJWvJYYkUK3tu6pPO0
qLVO/YKDW+Tm3wg9mPe2HowbcTpxmDEv0jqbKvUGe+Dpc3zRrNcyyZVGFPSGe3bk
Ro+hj0ndLd39I/eZjwmW+Xh4FyZwQ9Abu1+DhlKSes91iRUwYQ7K9qKHHPt9CiRF
FVIPaJQQvhYGDAlt9PvASIxzYfKkgMdDqHJIt4lo7l9L+s8t7M5964c1sIEtNaBO
xx837uERBVt6wr70ORU04kQvOp8cr1+81lRtDADAfuKKYsBQaCBxNm6CAqgZOf3U
hXLWMP19r54qvhyoSS4Au6H6yAWYfgCuuWKsQ1TvHidJz1yMlZL3QxuGH/SYITIx
5HfgaH9BAoEh84T9hwO3MPvD3N72hUmtAHmWurmD4f2WGnpG1fKBp4Urs/2xzuLR
oZ4Rx+XLuKuCEBuMXduKU0/ZDzNUQv0D61+2PTfT0fJVDEBGbbPTSkBcVQNmoTrQ
kZFl6InvcJ9iW4PId411JSUVo75EsXmZuVCIoZpZlJ+KCpit6CAifWOCBGUzzUAs
pfa+0W7yvhWgoIY+CIkO9lMR3VMCuktfL92tXIaIUFHRM8r7lKlUtyKQd6IE1eox
QcKCiiWLCk3jHf900Css
=EoeN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

