Delivery-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:16:03 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98FDC1E0A98;
	Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:16:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1351030C30;
	Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:15:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FBA330C23
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:15:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id hlskDX1Sejt0 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:15:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qg0-x229.google.com (mail-qg0-x229.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::229])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F33430775
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:15:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id i50so4465874qgf.14
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=741/8ihbjPeVdWZt6sNbX8KEn9KpoHEIGj4z1bUUU9s=;
 b=jMlXE4zInW6ZmSXQ6rHqf3XGCYSi0okdQGFu9Idv8jcxJrmB9os/Iq9GpcdhIdIfXp
 8nm4n0JcMeWjJ0Ld0cFRrygj3epSzhE9rCMna+/JqzSm3Aa8hMUFubeDZ5gzthz6vcI5
 A/2Voh8Y73w9q9+x4RgBriDWUTCQjCQX8vydWFF78SCDfnHKIy6lO9R/HaG13xuYn6Fb
 26kudKfAnyxaJXe0L5g1pINGbBWuVdyVIsPFq2hpooBPqph3rKZBJ7+nbNA6Aqx5m3iM
 t+OTkkzj8kFzakAKHdy9Rg55TG6DFO5fj8HLKoMAgsuauFrpQeQLP6WKiRFhphQw3AtZ
 viYg==
X-Received: by 10.224.88.3 with SMTP id y3mr38677593qal.65.1409516151014;
 Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (host111.181-14-225.telecom.net.ar. [181.14.225.111])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
 i93sm9114889qgd.43.2014.08.31.13.15.49
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:15:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <54038276.66538c0a.32d3.ffff88fa@mx.google.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 17:22:57 -0300
From: Juan <juan.g71@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <540121E7.2090906@riseup.net>
References: <20140829112001.40E8A40F7F@mail.unseen.is>
 <540121E7.2090906@riseup.net>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.10; i486-slitaz-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] I have a quick question about security of tor with 3
 nodes
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 18:59:19 -0600
Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:

> On 08/29/2014 01:55 AM, John Doe wrote:
> > Surely this is not as simple as that which you said. Why have even a
> > middle node if it is only the first and last nodes that count? I
> > cannot believe this is a simple thing of the first and last nodes
> > giving people up.
> 
> Some do use just entry guard and exit relay, for lower latency.
> 
> Even the NSA, with global intercepts, is apparently not doing
> full-network traffic correlation among Tor relays.

	And you know that how, exactly?



> Maybe they will
> after Bluffdale is fully functional.
> 

	Or maybe not...? Because, maybe, the idea hasn't crossed their
	minds? Or? 




> But Sybil attacks are clearly feasible, and require just some cloud
> servers and the skills to use them. See Johnson et al. (2013).[0] It
> seems that Sybil attacks against Tor are limited in scale not so much
> by an adversary's resources, but rather through oversight by Tor
> Project staff. Even though Tor is an open network, relays that behave
> suspiciously get evicted.
> 
> [0] Johnson et al. (2013) Users Get Routed: Traffic Correlation on Tor
> by Realistic Adversaries.
> http://www.ohmygodel.com/publications/usersrouted-ccs13.pdf

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

