Delivery-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 22:12:20 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 482E91E050E;
	Tue, 26 Aug 2014 22:12:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D8B2A8FB;
	Wed, 27 Aug 2014 02:11:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BAA1290D4;
 Wed, 27 Aug 2014 02:11:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 8-R7R66u_b11; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 02:11:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B5D5288C8;
 Wed, 27 Aug 2014 02:11:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hi2so5083717wib.16
 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=+TyAYqOT9W57DDkOIVSU5gtG23tzH224tWM6S9v6A8Q=;
 b=V86WB5wxPxJXMCRhaUkM9tltBg7oRHDndrNefptUztGcU/2EaSGXvnMPf3Og1uiAbL
 ObLZDZk02uYbUjUqaxSYI0pCn5KqTPK58enHcvo+1JKhh6vwhk3C+woS3OF2Sm8JGBOD
 KxyxyA6Bl3Yg41JmDWZCm0eLrt3MdN6SqJisyd1k8aGULi+VA69X7OoWADu0edFJUzhD
 zfxi+AtIsIjUFXaYw5p928qitPUeqTztSwRg0ihRol+8FyH/rGF/5ER+FeUJgijFeCeN
 0Zpkew1PZGwyVledFjBofAY/J63b7isJ8vb8cZAU/0A8Y6mpWLXBkxma/Hk5+ctygsL1
 nmpw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.94.196 with SMTP id de4mr19723606wjb.86.1409105509038;
 Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.102.38 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 11:11:49 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKMgAkRFEV-hEU+9oGn14arBTENmqQ6R4jXvMd5ze1uqDpjrkw@mail.gmail.com>
From: saurav dahal <dahal.saurav@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org, tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [tor-talk] Bandwidth Weighted Node selection algorithm
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Hello,

In the paper,

 "Zhen Ling; Junzhou Luo; Wei Yu; Ming Yang; Xinwen Fu, "Extensive analysis
and large-scale empirical evaluation of tor bridge discovery," *INFOCOM,
2012 Proceedings IEEE* , vol., no., pp.2381,2389, 25-30 March 2012",

the author has mentioned about Bandwidth Weighted Node selection algorithm.
He has mentioned about bandwidth weights WG and WE, responsible for node
selection.

But in the Tor directory protocol version 3, there is no such mention of
these weights but rather there are other weights such as Wgg, Wee, etc.

Can anybody please elaborate on this?

Thanks,

-- 

Saurav
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

