Delivery-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 19:32:18 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B0BD1E0B88;
	Fri, 22 Aug 2014 19:32:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74AC301FE;
	Fri, 22 Aug 2014 23:32:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A41E2FFB4
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 23:32:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id TFXdcQ9KoGJO for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 22 Aug 2014 23:32:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11DC42910F
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 23:32:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from berryeater.riseup.net (berryeater-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.120])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26F2056612
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 23:32:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: mirimir) with ESMTPSA id 2C47F40F05
Message-ID: <53F7D2FF.7030006@riseup.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:32:15 -0600
From: Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <2fb56adafa60595fc1fd9d473a3c5012.squirrel@bitmessage.ch>
 <53F7C159.1030303@cryptopathie.eu> <53F7CEE1.2000707@gmx.com>
In-Reply-To: <53F7CEE1.2000707@gmx.com>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] TOR tried to take a snapshot of my screen
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 08/22/2014 05:14 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> 
> On 8/22/2014 5:16 PM, no.thing_to-hide@cryptopathie.eu wrote:
>>
>> One of us downloaded a wrong Tor installer package ...
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Anton
>>
> Please expand on the possibilities beyond the face value statement.
> That is, assuming the OP downloaded the Tor software from the legitimate
> TorProject site, using HTTPS.

Maybe Zemana is incorrectly flagging some aspect of HTML5 canvas
spoofing by the Tor browser as taking a screen snapshot".

> Like, among other things, SSL was / is cracked & files manipulated - at
> least in some cases.
> That may not be the case here - at all, but I believe Snowdens'
> documents (strongly) indicated that SSL had indeed been cracked.
> That's not exactly conspiracy theory, anymore.
> 
> And if that was the case, did most of the internet community promptly
> stuck their heads in the sand?  (Just asking).
> But I'm not asking about conspiracy theories w/ no documented evidence.
> 
> Or, this could be a hoax by the OP, or a simple mistake.
> There could be other <possible> partial explanations, which may or may
> not have ever been discovered or discussed.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

