Delivery-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 19:15:20 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F06571E0677;
	Fri, 22 Aug 2014 19:15:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4968530039;
	Fri, 22 Aug 2014 23:15:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B693048A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 23:15:12 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id YCKPYR1yXMHU for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 22 Aug 2014 23:15:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.200])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B74D30483
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 23:15:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([99.190.181.188]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus001)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MAPka-1XDqER0Bzu-00Bb1b for
 <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 01:15:09 +0200
Message-ID: <53F7CEE1.2000707@gmx.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 18:14:41 -0500
From: Joe Btfsplk <joebtfsplk@gmx.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <2fb56adafa60595fc1fd9d473a3c5012.squirrel@bitmessage.ch>
 <53F7C159.1030303@cryptopathie.eu>
In-Reply-To: <53F7C159.1030303@cryptopathie.eu>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:AVXj8R0Xi4qmK+/hznFKznORVZ9si7IEso26RP5rK5laxydNOc8
 iNngrRW1dqwHG2Nhqsacnku+TEDJ98apBN4Bgh0rtw4fw7VhRpPrEwSMttvVbxhZ6vq2ho7
 AgkbZhG9w51ebpDmY11BrZu9H8q6sQD7YH/Yk0z3qsmrH6DgK2mTYF0iQbRJgPGPypakL1m
 hg8R3rXMjZi9GYSRhFeEg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] TOR tried to take a snapshot of my screen
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>


On 8/22/2014 5:16 PM, no.thing_to-hide@cryptopathie.eu wrote:
>
> One of us downloaded a wrong Tor installer package ...
>
> Best regards
>
> Anton
>
Please expand on the possibilities beyond the face value statement.
That is, assuming the OP downloaded the Tor software from the legitimate 
TorProject site, using HTTPS.

Like, among other things, SSL was / is cracked & files manipulated - at 
least in some cases.
That may not be the case here - at all, but I believe Snowdens' 
documents (strongly) indicated that SSL had indeed been cracked.
That's not exactly conspiracy theory, anymore.

And if that was the case, did most of the internet community promptly 
stuck their heads in the sand?  (Just asking).
But I'm not asking about conspiracy theories w/ no documented evidence.

Or, this could be a hoax by the OP, or a simple mistake.
There could be other <possible> partial explanations, which may or may 
not have ever been discovered or discussed.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

