Delivery-Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 14:28:54 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 418E41E0526;
	Sun, 17 Aug 2014 14:28:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E3E3078B;
	Sun, 17 Aug 2014 18:28:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4855C2FAE3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 18:28:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id pDQQ8BLwDspF for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun, 17 Aug 2014 18:28:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oa0-x235.google.com (mail-oa0-x235.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::235])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DBC2201D3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 18:28:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id j17so3322621oag.26
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 11:28:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
 :from:to:content-type;
 bh=ExomAH1WmgGq2p/a3zQhd99ip/ZIzoZ18chKAzrJs2g=;
 b=gGhLu6YjGmxXfv9UO3cPkcumnoPUSbS6nJM4iye4gu0sQu1s/rXqn+xyGktIEos6zn
 E1UPGNLISN+OQUOXA5oLmtxY7y+EuWuN+g8wuOQ1CoUS1jRwSdvVBdN4AIPISMeI+fRy
 Gy/Ovx2NEw4FPThsTgsjvlqjsrIn0LcwztZpS6eiXJLa9u3CceChr85w3dOWe79M0xfY
 5fP3Wf1JFJeiE/lhs6sihOVp0rhwJAqkGxu1dDkipWQP404GetRJ2tfVpfXqtzXRVees
 DdhocY3BzpEwnEg7IDX71gXH+5QWr8bVBoJpbE+9EASTG5Z8fLVldxpnzUym18qUhEny
 /N6w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.224.227 with SMTP id rf3mr3012026obc.70.1408300122822;
 Sun, 17 Aug 2014 11:28:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.224.84 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 11:28:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53F04D1C.2040006@googlemail.com>
References: <20140816194615.30FE5C032C@cappadocicum.torproject.org>
 <53EFC56D.8040808@googlemail.com>
 <5356AF2C-485C-429A-B8F5-9AF3C5878C87@sebastianhahn.net>
 <53F04D1C.2040006@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 11:28:42 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3eivb1rCySYQ2-TwDhfCpMRjf8E
Message-ID: <CAJdkzEMKsHx60KKyA+o0+mPK_BT2KOvAuQkMQrZTmpEyjU5MOw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Damian Johnson <atagar@torproject.org>
To: Tor Mailing List <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] [tor-consensus-health] Consensus issues
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

> Attention Damian Johnson ;)
>
> How about "Consensus fetched from ..." or "Consensus downloaded from..."?
>
> (If that requires discussion I happily open a ticket)
>
> I don't see any benefit (at first glance) to change (and most likely
> increase complexity) the voting/signing process. Especially since the
> consensus is valid and it is expected to be fetchable from any authority.

Hi Sebastian. Changed it to 'Consensus fetched from'.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

