Delivery-Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 16:56:24 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C1BE1E0AEF;
	Sat, 16 Aug 2014 16:56:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E90630C3A;
	Sat, 16 Aug 2014 20:56:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3103092B
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 20:56:17 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id sxCNmVbPyak2 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat, 16 Aug 2014 20:56:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-x244.google.com (mail-wi0-x244.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::244])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC08E308D9
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 20:56:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f196.google.com with SMTP id ho1so900207wib.11
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 13:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
 h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
 :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=3mTC61OxE0/1HLn02tfQKCsSAFCSNO6YMOV2k/F9MFM=;
 b=BaSkWsM+yFKLNYYQOYj37Lwqfa5u6k26Q5XhAqB504PTLeqNwECxqvfAFp1swNenJr
 bAsjmvT0Ng4VPWCmfpa9m4ZdhR75ZB6l5AV0i3mD15Bp5uyDO+fGbRMUnxFfFCQj4BB8
 NdEr06T4Eq1ngmX78/kDufO0NMECYvdb8slioafqVDh7iK8UShJtdeU5WzOojz68vXKZ
 b4DJ0xRv9CGLVrEIOQ1OS7AfvbfXmf7VmLsfdVwYcvWZY0Qoqu7RS27oI1X4bTwLhumG
 PAs6hie0jGv9+auT+ruWleP8+gV1eIahtWXWKKm0DChrQMdGE8jPqp3lG5YBb3fKCxzW
 OpDA==
X-Received: by 10.180.19.200 with SMTP id h8mr64419019wie.32.1408222573784;
 Sat, 16 Aug 2014 13:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.129]
 (dslb-188-100-167-151.188.100.pools.vodafone-ip.de. [188.100.167.151])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fv10sm20227334wic.23.2014.08.16.13.56.12
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Sat, 16 Aug 2014 13:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53EFC56D.8040808@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 22:56:13 +0200
From: "Sebastian G. <bastik.tor>" <bastik.tor@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <20140816194615.30FE5C032C@cappadocicum.torproject.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140816194615.30FE5C032C@cappadocicum.torproject.org>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20140816194615.30FE5C032C@cappadocicum.torproject.org>
Subject: [tor-talk] Fwd: [tor-consensus-health] Consensus issues
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 19:46:15 +0000 (UTC) the doctor said:

> NOTICE: Consensus belonging to maatuska was missing the following authority signatures: tor26
> NOTICE: Consensus belonging to tor26 was missing the following authority signatures: tor26
> NOTICE: Consensus belonging to urras was missing the following authority signatures: tor26
> NOTICE: Consensus belonging to dizum was missing the following authority signatures: tor26
> NOTICE: Consensus belonging to gabelmoo was missing the following authority signatures: tor26
> NOTICE: Consensus belonging to moria1 was missing the following authority signatures: tor26
> NOTICE: Consensus belonging to dannenberg was missing the following authority signatures: tor26
> NOTICE: Consensus belonging to Faravahar was missing the following authority signatures: tor26

If I understand this messages correctly tor26 didn't sign the consensus
of any other authority. (Correct me if I'm wrong.)

How is it possible that tor26 doesn't sign its own consensus?

A similar message was send on the 15th for gabelmoo, but gabelmoo had no
notice line. There were two warning, first gabelmoo did not publish a
fresh consensus and secondly it did not report bandwidth scanner
results. Nothing I would have worried about. Nor would I have found strange.

However an authority handing out a consensus it didn't sign might be
something that isn't quite right.

Regards,
Sebastian G.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

