Delivery-Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 01:37:09 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 427E51E0BDA;
	Sun,  3 Aug 2014 01:37:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9522630D18;
	Sun,  3 Aug 2014 05:37:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C6630D11
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun,  3 Aug 2014 05:36:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id sge7WzOM7ZmE for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun,  3 Aug 2014 05:36:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EC2830D0E
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun,  3 Aug 2014 05:36:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fulvetta.riseup.net (fulvetta-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.75])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68DA84C01B
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat,  2 Aug 2014 22:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1407044213; bh=J8FfEpDO9tnkh/FRNz3ifECEFLpn804pxMREn4+lwXk=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=LhhtJzopaHr4z6ZJVk0/3mJieLZJ09hIpa++OUYhqwpkxd/SdUXFhDK3b+5HrkBMU
 F0pDKgzOjeqBlFCLPj9EkYSFe//b5m9bOEQaT+Ott+1JvvE8noJh+fX4ndU5T5fQm8
 PXQjymjSubldWcD/uFndwXXsMlrCGBvSArZrNOCU=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: mirimir@fulvetta.riseup.net)
 with ESMTPSA id 648CA25F
Message-ID: <53DDCB0B.3030202@riseup.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2014 23:39:23 -0600
From: Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <53DCAEEB.7020200@bitmessage.ch> <53DD2450.9010905@riseup.net>
 <53DD2E4F.3060100@gmx.com>
In-Reply-To: <53DD2E4F.3060100@gmx.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.1 at mx1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] JonDo uses Tor v0.2.3.25 SocksPort but not for
 v0.2.4.20-v0.2.4.23; why?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 08/02/2014 12:30 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> On 8/2/2014 12:48 PM, Mirimir wrote:
>> I've been playing with JAP/JonDo routed through Tor. The JonDo client
>> has a SOCKS proxy option, and it works well with Tor v0.2.3.25
>> SocksPorts in Ubuntu 14.04.1 x64. I installed Tor from the Ubuntu 12.04
>> repository, by the way.
>>
>> After upgrading Tor to v0.2.4.20, which is default in Ubuntu 14.04, the
>> JonDo client can no longer use Tor SocksPorts. Upgrading Tor to the
>> latest v0.2.4.23 doesn't restore that functionality.
>>
>> Please share insight. I'm guessing that a security fix in Tor, or in
>> libraries that it uses, has broken something about how the JonDo client
>> uses SOCKS proxies.
>>
> Other than just playing / testing, if going to use Tor *network* anyway,
> what might be the advantage of using vanilla Firefox w/ the JonDo
> profile (extension) rather than Torbrowser?  Just asking.

It's not the browser profile that I care about so much. Tor and JonDo
are rather complementary. Against non-global adversaries with
substantial Sybil resources, maybe JonDo is a useful firewall.

> Seems Torbrowser w/ Torbutton & all other customizations to Fx, it is
> modified to be more anonymous & safer than even Firefox using the JonDo
> extension.

I agree.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

