Delivery-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:16:02 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7531C1E0AA6;
	Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:16:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC978309D3;
	Thu, 14 Aug 2014 18:15:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418DB3092B
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 18:15:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id t71zlp5PsQWI for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 14 Aug 2014 18:15:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-x22f.google.com (mail-vc0-x22f.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22f])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19FC13027B
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 18:15:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id ik5so1818007vcb.6
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 11:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=M8EiJdvF6mLHsKya9xtAsS7Oy2L/CBUhg7RGFL+XS9U=;
 b=JSlRfDjOuZSXns8cMVWDRrtlxK/SgPXkyOk7Wu/EvPLVYIsUx25O5Q1KsWlwTvTIlG
 yuHCyu1u/V08K+TdofMkd3NMp7ihokv6Kv5dyAE+5yECirzJk4EU23PKZvRH83fdXQ7E
 zcykngmJHedPiameB9ykbA+xodQ3QApJfCMVEVZk3mN8DKlRms6+ZGahKrh3DtekSQVp
 L7/Um6i5ozhpBEAHtxm04wQoybIfroDTpDd2wIkxbGL8nx9hTqRNfk8DdLvZvTYiZ0za
 5lh/gxe7nmEETuE7PIgRH26bN0IuiKVJReZDmne34e8VLlr9esRthClpndHjqbT4pT00
 7OVA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.243.10 with SMTP id wu10mr3843114vdc.45.1408040151485;
 Thu, 14 Aug 2014 11:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.77.73 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 11:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHXoDSBJ7mRnPR=USJdo7rCO5h46w9whz39ZtgQoNuAf+Uyojg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHXoDSAM=D1kvodauWYkZ9+9UPFtuFfKKqgeRAv=qJS1D9V5iA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ5w9HU2x1rZc8JEaATbkNy4JmwHdRr5X_CUtHa7M+fUYUx38Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHXoDSBJ7mRnPR=USJdo7rCO5h46w9whz39ZtgQoNuAf+Uyojg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 20:15:51 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHXoDSBseL2V-5-9CUiLBpVO_KqBcN-UP0fNp10y6hK-=c2QXA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin S <shieldfire@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Performance
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

The above may also relate to our partners, which definately shouldn't
access our office through VPN.

2014-08-14 20:07 GMT+02:00 Martin S <shieldfire@gmail.com>:
> I am planning to use it as a proxy with services for the offices. Not
> as a VPN to our own office.
>
> The thing is that the offices almost totally lack any local IT
> resources and expertise. They are also situated in countries, or work
> with countries that are Democracy and/or Human Rights challenged, or
> with stone age laws regarding Sexual and Reproductive Health or
> vulnerable to third party military forces. And so on.
>
> Therefore there are reasons to protect the browsing habits of the local offices.
>
> /Martin S
>
> 2014-08-14 19:03 GMT+02:00 Soul Plane <soulplane11@gmail.com>:
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Martin S <shieldfire@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I've set up a Tor and Privoxy chain for our organisation, especially
>>> for our courntry offices, of which some work in high risk countries.
>>>
>>
>> Pardon me asking this maybe it's obvious but why wouldn't you use an
>> intranet VPN instead of Tor for your offices? You are using Tor to lower
>> the risk of your offices how?
>> --
>> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
>> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Martin S



-- 
Regards,

Martin S
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

