Delivery-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:07:32 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E3B11E0AA6;
	Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:07:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A659309BF;
	Thu, 14 Aug 2014 18:07:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DBF308CF
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 18:07:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id QmfBomlQoqiB for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 14 Aug 2014 18:07:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-x234.google.com (mail-vc0-x234.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::234])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DD9130780
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 18:07:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ij19so1837562vcb.39
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 11:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=OnwukIER4ifx4HyqayZ29DVkurYaCUjK7c4boCFFJ5s=;
 b=Qnu2D5yE0q/o4CNHdaf3Xz2bUcFqUg2lKmtuAUfSclo1WTp4W+OdnBw4XUGftZstFU
 on0qW9a6LhaRMgusJPFSXrXaLV98DLlyP6UePkH1EoiyLsdnPY6g9QU3nz1JL3sxFSRm
 NDB4DYNtBhYo6h2dNT4FIlXP5amFCMTNeHZlc9b6b32hIK2L6J6ahSqjsgyZjGvJDBeo
 y3Tu2UB5RlQEYYAHYFsgMo0Z4WwabxLy9S2QjQNV559auiBLDClAqYZhGsa/ZZ1KeJKu
 Hl2o0qj0ov/H1hFvdxI2+/5QKyrfRW4+flUo9yHGQdufu8OTHzPCcg1TC5kTkRu5YKxL
 Z24g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.221.47.9 with SMTP id uq9mr3808823vcb.48.1408039640904; Thu,
 14 Aug 2014 11:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.77.73 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 11:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ5w9HU2x1rZc8JEaATbkNy4JmwHdRr5X_CUtHa7M+fUYUx38Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHXoDSAM=D1kvodauWYkZ9+9UPFtuFfKKqgeRAv=qJS1D9V5iA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ5w9HU2x1rZc8JEaATbkNy4JmwHdRr5X_CUtHa7M+fUYUx38Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 20:07:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHXoDSBJ7mRnPR=USJdo7rCO5h46w9whz39ZtgQoNuAf+Uyojg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin S <shieldfire@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Performance
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

I am planning to use it as a proxy with services for the offices. Not
as a VPN to our own office.

The thing is that the offices almost totally lack any local IT
resources and expertise. They are also situated in countries, or work
with countries that are Democracy and/or Human Rights challenged, or
with stone age laws regarding Sexual and Reproductive Health or
vulnerable to third party military forces. And so on.

Therefore there are reasons to protect the browsing habits of the local offices.

/Martin S

2014-08-14 19:03 GMT+02:00 Soul Plane <soulplane11@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Martin S <shieldfire@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've set up a Tor and Privoxy chain for our organisation, especially
>> for our courntry offices, of which some work in high risk countries.
>>
>
> Pardon me asking this maybe it's obvious but why wouldn't you use an
> intranet VPN instead of Tor for your offices? You are using Tor to lower
> the risk of your offices how?
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk



-- 
Regards,

Martin S
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

