Delivery-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 09:16:35 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C29E1E0A34;
	Thu, 14 Aug 2014 09:16:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FA1303ED;
	Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:16:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5782D308E2
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:16:26 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id Z8eSR_Qo9g_Q for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:16:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-x236.google.com (mail-vc0-x236.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::236])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36961303ED
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:16:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id hy4so1304242vcb.41
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 06:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=JktXjGd6aQ7gtsv+RFaQXsCd0HwdJiuSJ0HFNUIq/kY=;
 b=C8KmljapMoqdTVumoBhN8bvgNFH3DZK0sVfebm40ImtUQipAxGUbvJbdcPuSdq4mEe
 7neZVtHWWP11ppDumc7ssPb9zmNEYSPisJnwEGiF83j7l25px90QMyRH0MuoGep6Ekto
 cQFrStJyc+oxQNKUj5EZFotpMtfUmWfMx/pruAnn3US+7440xT5qeW/TaWkiZAeQcgAf
 uQHpjD22k/GW5W9TCzkS9pl2QCwjhroP5BYoHh2SmVW19z1cYJi0xUFQ/7qUCSXGIEVF
 Vq3YXcy9w0Um5MGVwc9eYZq/eD0r52JkIY80StVWWV4IqcAr5UB52TyjLJOfk9nq8EOA
 M8HA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.232.200 with SMTP id tq8mr7876978vdc.32.1408022183039;
 Thu, 14 Aug 2014 06:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.77.73 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 06:16:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140813210532.GN8819@moria.seul.org>
References: <CAHXoDSAM=D1kvodauWYkZ9+9UPFtuFfKKqgeRAv=qJS1D9V5iA@mail.gmail.com>
 <53EBC80F.6040405@gmx.com> <20140813210532.GN8819@moria.seul.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 15:16:22 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHXoDSAx6OguMVx342t4eT4HyyeyKYD+Lpisgu-Km4nyFYUy9Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin S <shieldfire@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Performance
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

2014-08-13 23:05 GMT+02:00 Roger Dingledine <arma@mit.edu>:

> I guess the broader question is what the original poster was trying
> to do -- if the goal is to give Tor's protection to everybody in the
> organization, and the way they did it was to leave everybody using
> Internet Explorer, and then redirect outgoing traffic into Privoxy
> which sends it through Tor, then the users are missing out on all
> the application-level privacy and security features that Tor Browser
> gives you:
> https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser/design/

Basically this (or Firefox, or Chrome as it might be). This is the
scenario for our office in Stockholm, where the main part of our users
are. For the users in our foreign offices the Torbrowser (which may or
may not be considered hideously slow) is obviously an obvious
alternative.

Also, we are considering running (a) hidden service(s) on the server
in the future.

Is there a document somewhere that describes the differences between
what I've been doing and using the Torbrowser?

/Martin S
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

