Delivery-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 02:31:03 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A05631E0E33;
	Thu, 14 Aug 2014 02:31:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA9930038;
	Thu, 14 Aug 2014 06:30:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580402FFAD
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 06:30:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id ymMEieBFd641 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 14 Aug 2014 06:30:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ig0-x230.google.com (mail-ig0-x230.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::230])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E9242FFA7
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 06:30:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ig0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hn18so12598307igb.15
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 23:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=virgil.gr; s=dkim;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=V8rb7o71ky3R4M7PwRIbRpicJzJQeZ+KrJod7Ap4IKI=;
 b=BXxC3x4xJzJPH2r55r5SLsAf34+zI9WDxnLlkATo37mtoK+QCpkvKVZQpBF3RlRVpS
 evEx0yGxNowKtyDpekdTSKkzDYfdQDvsBkfAmW/5PeF5yhBt4bnD5PHufb3B/eecybdd
 18hofO6ypqewS5h0wt7T52ppFR5DRUsx9EZHc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=V8rb7o71ky3R4M7PwRIbRpicJzJQeZ+KrJod7Ap4IKI=;
 b=FAAoW7ZuAQvgDlJa0aJLPnxb/OQyPqWzdFsUBVXUV2ldH4XA+L7jZ/oBS+wQNnUB4A
 B9EbhydkNBKNihd9HaoHvx5XCuI/M6T0YgH77fzvDp9uK3SKScff+3Wh5zvwqiCa6GIQ
 t80lm3TFELI2e1b2VMdFQw4tZjfCZ0e/KapnfiEXxdUic9ruzZaJoZxlwn0gAxWfLky+
 aWtS41VMZ+nAFq5l+6oUyFd5sfzw7tTS2WIH+kIJRLSJ2xgCFDitAGFscC8HbcAEaHnN
 woJg5j3kypZb5KUsqXbPsKm0HZaZLjUcyz0bUl0/oi4tDje2oytYzP6s48LGyOyrKyX4
 7jXQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmBvME1WVKV/0rUw1pNLdZFi5Fw/28DTsThnnLIGAeJh2GQWua5A+9WumEPVgNZj8zhM3IG
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.143.65 with SMTP id sc1mr13805329igb.19.1407997851119;
 Wed, 13 Aug 2014 23:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.134.2 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 23:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53EC4751.1030208@torproject.org>
References: <CADop2NHJ7NyDERbbGVOFtMefc=n-f-y86zcpS+8Hc-rcd2sVhA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADop2NEM4n5ebEdGz_W-Mvk4W6bxa+fe=WHPdQrK2L_41457YQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <38dd2124de8287448ac0f085bd05d3aa@cryptolab.net>
 <53EC4751.1030208@torproject.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 23:30:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CADop2NF75ryNWAtQiST5+v8mgx00zE6xLUmf2pQyp_abCPMLxQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Virgil Griffith <i@virgil.gr>
To: "tor-talk@lists.torproject.org" <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Is there a known tool/script for analyzing the Tor
	consensus files?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

I am interested in the diffs between two consensus files.  E.g.,
* which relays are in only one of the two consensus files
* substantial changes in advertised/read bandwidth for a relay in both
consensus files


-V
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

