Delivery-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2014 14:30:49 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF60F1E0480;
	Sat,  2 Aug 2014 14:30:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78AE130D18;
	Sat,  2 Aug 2014 18:30:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B5930D14
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat,  2 Aug 2014 18:30:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id LpbT3NfPG8xe for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat,  2 Aug 2014 18:30:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.200])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47F9230C28
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat,  2 Aug 2014 18:30:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([99.190.181.188]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus001)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MWSs8-1WypxW2PXe-00XdQo for
 <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 02 Aug 2014 20:30:36 +0200
Message-ID: <53DD2E4F.3060100@gmx.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2014 13:30:39 -0500
From: Joe Btfsplk <joebtfsplk@gmx.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <53DCAEEB.7020200@bitmessage.ch> <53DD2450.9010905@riseup.net>
In-Reply-To: <53DD2450.9010905@riseup.net>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:oxgh1rzj3dFqahy/pRtiVvBHwDH/f7u2/3P/YjwONxfrjRxUn+3
 t/IjM1xbunIbwvG9xnMJLP9dNwjlZT8q2h1LO4wmIaVT90Zpkw9J3X8i75nSRhIGqwRQXnt
 mHACpn5gz/IhckHmGdocaOPy2toxodf/O8GcuUrRYMHF7VO9NNjSwWgfehrs+mNrs89IFfI
 OyCVrmALm4mZsUgzIZ/Og==
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] JonDo uses Tor v0.2.3.25 SocksPort but not for
 v0.2.4.20-v0.2.4.23; why?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 8/2/2014 12:48 PM, Mirimir wrote:
> I've been playing with JAP/JonDo routed through Tor. The JonDo client
> has a SOCKS proxy option, and it works well with Tor v0.2.3.25
> SocksPorts in Ubuntu 14.04.1 x64. I installed Tor from the Ubuntu 12.04
> repository, by the way.
>
> After upgrading Tor to v0.2.4.20, which is default in Ubuntu 14.04, the
> JonDo client can no longer use Tor SocksPorts. Upgrading Tor to the
> latest v0.2.4.23 doesn't restore that functionality.
>
> Please share insight. I'm guessing that a security fix in Tor, or in
> libraries that it uses, has broken something about how the JonDo client
> uses SOCKS proxies.
>
Other than just playing / testing, if going to use Tor *network* anyway, 
what might be the advantage of using vanilla Firefox w/ the JonDo 
profile (extension) rather than Torbrowser?  Just asking.

Seems Torbrowser w/ Torbutton & all other customizations to Fx, it is 
modified to be more anonymous & safer than even Firefox using the JonDo 
extension.

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

