Delivery-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 06:10:09 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6B861E0A64;
	Tue, 12 Aug 2014 06:10:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF66230540;
	Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:10:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C75A3027B
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:10:01 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 2bLTxkaWmMlg for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:10:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 348C63026D
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:10:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plantcutter.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.121])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FF5651D1C
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 03:09:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1407838198; bh=o+rHlqDsmO9+TnXtbhQFYK2Ca0LuCoO+jHHop7GAcKk=;
 h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
 b=qVmBStYS2WcuXqBJrbH/BLrGsv29UmT5yrJ2D2yefLAI4yz32Provtqzr8ja55xKF
 WGzjpvA7sKql80abbnZZY+JJRnc6Lenskl2zTFt1qfgDSiCL8DPjjFs9goQhKApFTj
 WhEyKbhPoZV2fV9FGtyPj7S4uXBTEgu/mr12qMOE=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: desnacked) with ESMTPSA id 988FC22551
From: George Kadianakis <desnacked@riseup.net>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <CAKMgAkS-aS+7Vte6QGKe+7xwSgOynHA9eXJrUNBOv=8NJD7dNQ@mail.gmail.com>
 (saurav dahal's message of "Tue, 12 Aug 2014 18:52:40 +0900")
References: <CAKMgAkSgH_3SR=z80is6RxUR=FVdvdYEDzxDn_MOPyzkyyGVXQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87ppg6152h.fsf@riseup.net>
 <CAKMgAkS-aS+7Vte6QGKe+7xwSgOynHA9eXJrUNBOv=8NJD7dNQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 13:10:17 +0300
Message-ID: <87sil2uigm.fsf@riseup.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.1 at mx1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] About bandwidth weights selection
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

saurav dahal <dahal.saurav@gmail.com> writes:

> Under which condition, the client will choose Guard flagged node and
> Guard+Exit flagged node for guard position?
>

Tor will consider any node with the Guard flag during guard selection
(this also includes Guard+Exit nodes). As you noticed, it will apply
different weights to nodes with the Guard flag and to nodes with the
Guard+Exit flag.

Please read the "Guard nodes" section of path-spec.txt:
https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/blob/HEAD:/path-spec.txt

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

