Delivery-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 06:03:20 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C8E51E0500;
	Fri,  8 Aug 2014 06:03:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE5D29208;
	Fri,  8 Aug 2014 10:03:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011DA2862E
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  8 Aug 2014 10:03:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id iiq4iVnUH-h0 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri,  8 Aug 2014 10:03:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from jessica.everdot.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:1c12::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C35B4265F6
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  8 Aug 2014 10:03:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.everdot.org (primail.everdot.org [IPv6:2001:470:dc2e:5::2])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by jessica.everdot.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DE8DFA0652
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  8 Aug 2014 12:03:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.everdot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30D99122EE8
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  8 Aug 2014 12:03:06 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at everdot.org
Received: from mail.everdot.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (everdot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id oLtMI0vDyzB5 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri,  8 Aug 2014 12:02:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from meilong (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:dc2e:2:404a:7238:7265:5dcc])
 (using SSLv3 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.everdot.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E7D99122C89
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  8 Aug 2014 12:02:59 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 12:02:50 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?B?1nl2aW5k?= Saether <oyvinds@everdot.org>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <20140808120250.0e82f4c7@meilong>
In-Reply-To: <CAD2Ti28DSgptQf1zEijNc9gF-UgwU6pSJqpM27DCGg9EpqUk7A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3660653D-B230-40CA-B641-2C7D815DEE47@mail.bitmessage.ch>
 <53E3BE07.7010105@riseup.net> <53E3E530.7010105@gmx.com>
 <20140808103917.2b4f455a@meilong>
 <CAD2Ti28DSgptQf1zEijNc9gF-UgwU6pSJqpM27DCGg9EpqUk7A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Craigslist now blocking all Tor IPs? bad people use
 Tor
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2859646421404772907=="
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

--===============2859646421404772907==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
 boundary="Sig_/H=Ajf.OXXORKY+KHordvQ_M"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"

--Sig_/H=Ajf.OXXORKY+KHordvQ_M
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> Yet you neglect to both
> - fully qualify and describe those abusive requests here
> - state how many of the exact same thing you see from clearnet in a
> day
>=20
> Without such, the above report is unfortunately unqualified anti-tor
> FUD.

Of course I see no reason to indicate my involvement with the site in
question on this mailing list. :) If you want to call it FUD then
that's fine with me but you may want to ask yourself this simple
question: Why do people outright block Tor? Could it be that they do so
because they also see the same thing?

>> I fully understand why many people do not want this cost
> Cost? What cost? One (perhaps failed) request every 8.64 seconds?
> Really? Where can I mail you a dollar for your bandwidth.

Thank you. My BTC address is 18KyuTqQz5eM9BSsvf2RXjr5u6o57tUGSR

> 'Your site'? So you deploy ads in people's faces and complain that
> people use adblockers against you?
> And shareholders... based on a model that people hate and whose
> minds do pretty well at ignoring even without blockers? Lol, remind
> me to 'invest' elsewhere in things people like. Or at least start
> accepting cash donations/payments in the mail, or Bitcoin. Oh, but
> that might cost you to do work to open mail. Oy vey.

Yes. Selling advertisements do increase shareholder value. Accepting
donations do not. There are almost zero people who donate and that one
person who donates 0.005 BTC per month is not enough to pay costs and
pay dividends.

If anyone is wondering why she hates shareholders so much, watch this
documentary from 2003:
magnet:?xt=3Durn:btih:Y3FHC5ARKKSGPQG3VKUYAK7N22O64FYU&dn=3DThe%20Corporati=
on%202003%20(Dvdrip)%20XviD

> > from the Tor network without blocking it but implementing these
> Deal with clearnet properly and you will have done with Tor as well.

This is true and a very good point. Spammers gonna spam and it does not
make a big difference if they use Tor or a botnet. Many sites therefore
deal with these in the same way, they grab a big list and block them.

There are, as I said, better ways to deal with this. The trick is to
make it costly (require some form of human labor/interaction) to make
an account yet cheap enough so that legitimate actual people do create
accounts.

> > bottom line just to please the two Tor users who are not abusive
> > then
> Just two non abusive users? Reference please.

I was exaggerating, sorry. Most sites (smaller, anyway) have zero
legitimate Tor users.

--Sig_/H=Ajf.OXXORKY+KHordvQ_M
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlPkoFAACgkQNBSJHnwv/KojDACaA/uuohHtubAs2uPc0Jl+9Jb/
5ekAn38A+/duOIK/G/PWvWXtuRpdzT3e
=hR1M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/H=Ajf.OXXORKY+KHordvQ_M--

--===============2859646421404772907==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

--===============2859646421404772907==--

