Delivery-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 08:51:05 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A7731E0A88;
	Mon,  4 Apr 2016 08:51:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9B53A135;
	Mon,  4 Apr 2016 12:50:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8693A11F
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  4 Apr 2016 12:50:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id cLajLgOiCtFE for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon,  4 Apr 2016 12:50:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-in-05.arcor-online.net (mail-in-05.arcor-online.net
 [151.189.21.45])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "mx.arcor.de", Issuer "Thawte SSL CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AECB3A05F
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  4 Apr 2016 12:50:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-in-17-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-17-z2.arcor-online.net
 [151.189.8.34])
 by mx.arcor.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3qdsKg0SdGz2yk1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  4 Apr 2016 14:50:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-in-10.arcor-online.net (mail-in-10.arcor-online.net
 [151.189.21.50])
 by mail-in-17-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0FD1105C6
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  4 Apr 2016 14:50:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from webmail19.arcor-online.net (webmail19.arcor-online.net
 [151.189.8.77])
 by mail-in-10.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3qdsKf6cHqz8VPk
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  4 Apr 2016 14:50:46 +0200 (CEST)
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-10.arcor-online.net 3qdsKf6cHqz8VPk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arcor.de; s=mail-in;
 t=1459774246; bh=E4WbaMTRWVcTOJtnejKFvuTPZ+Wj8RGy/OVugsKz9z0=;
 h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:
 Content-Transfer-Encoding;
 b=k2LAVqyTo8pqDkb+vVPCNBw9teIE1oA7LULseufcsn1J7MPX4Te4acLV5BfXmN4Tl
 GzzmGp7NngpwR94wSfRq+d973BzalxjV8fibLSIuFGsoD2n/BFkx2kX0u6TIQOMRgH
 RU7b205NFcpSJtGbGVZHevKwW5YPsOxsg9iclEiQ=
Received: from [209.249.157.69] by webmail19.arcor-online.net (151.189.8.77)
 with HTTP (Arcor Webmail); Mon, 4 Apr 2016 14:50:46 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 14:50:46 +0200 (CEST)
From: tor_talk@arcor.de
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <773295298.405700.1459774246918.JavaMail.ngmail@webmail19.arcor-online.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-ngMessageSubType: MessageSubType_MAIL
X-WebmailclientIP: 209.249.157.69
Subject: [tor-talk] Innocent Seattle Exit Operators And Privacy Advocates
 Raided - Tor was run out of home
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Hi keb and Tor Talkers,

keb wrote:
>An exit node is indistinguishable from the
>computers that it is acting the proxy for (barring ip leaks), from the
>destination site's point of view.  Their own traffic would be mixed in
>with exit node traffic.

>Somewhere is a piece of advice from TorProject recommending people not
>to run an exit node from home for the above and other reasons.

it is a good advice but this time? it doesn't appear that the activists have technically done sth wrong. in contrary please take a moment to read that passage of the article.

https://www.thestranger.com/slog/2016/03/30/23885710/police-go-on-fishing-expedition-search-the-home-of-seattle-privacy-activists-who-maintain-tor-network
Bultmann and Robinson run a Tor exit node out of their home
Many of those who maintain the network nodes have been raided by the FBI across the country.

the fbi is quite active these days

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-apple-encryption-letter
The Federal Bureau of Investigation has assured law enforcement across the United States that it will help unlock mobile devices such as iPhones involved in investigations when it is allowed by law and policy. 

the civil forfeiture may help other law enforcements to comply with feds while it is removed from their state law

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/03/28/the-feds-have-resumed-a-controversial-program-that-lets-cops-take-stuff-and-keep-it/
The "Equitable Sharing Program" gives police the option of prosecuting some asset forfeiture cases under federal instead of state law, particularly in instances where local law enforcement officers have a relationship with federal authorities as part of a joint task force. Federal forfeiture policies are more permissive than many state policies, allowing police to keep up to 80 percent of assets they seize.
Asset forfeiture is fast growing -- in 2014, for instance, federal authorities seized more than $5 billion in assets. That's more than the value of assets lost in every single burglary that year.

with the help of the world 16 million citizens have pulled down the wall of mass surveillance in 1989 just to realize to be mass surveillanced with more modern devices. there will be a 4.500 qkm camp for refugees near syria/turkey. refugecity they call it even without concrete coordinates right now. how long will it take us to pull down the wall of fear. with any election these days the voters select their smaller terrifying future or - while their live is already without hope - the most worrying future for others painted by media/politicians. the panama paper project comes in the nick of time for the us election. but why can't we scroll through the database on our own as we can in wikileaks files? Is that really a leak as we are comfortable used to from the whistle-blowers JA supports. 

and why is https://www.seattleprivacy.org/ down for Tor users even with any other proxy i've tested even google translation don't work
there are some really nice categories as snippets show. well perhaps somebody is already on to it and my browser can't connect cause of the traffic



-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

