Delivery-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 11:21:07 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	FROM_BLANK_NAME,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4E0D1E02CA;
	Sat,  2 Apr 2016 11:21:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FD739FA8;
	Sat,  2 Apr 2016 15:21:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCCE39F7E
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat,  2 Apr 2016 15:20:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id ZgY5CLYnr64Y for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat,  2 Apr 2016 15:20:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from o1.mail.ghostmail.com (o1.mail.ghostmail.com [167.89.79.92])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAF6B39F78
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat,  2 Apr 2016 15:20:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 326 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at eugeni;
 Sat, 02 Apr 2016 15:20:56 UTC
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=ghostmail.com; 
 h=subject:from:to:mime-version:content-type; s=s1; 
 bh=hc7hOXw7oYFOKT6NBreLOSwh3y4=; b=Aehr/KdF9DFBzNIOsQ15WHs/rgIGr
 3JK9rXOmqXPcslfFqTpmhdi1AoPDVJXIdbXqimEPkfqxvXqQIKskHA+pcsvG59+1
 NgoxCOVAgbjicUzANIYs+gZco5kiAk+hRi4TyY5HvJ8Bm7N12S6PyC2kQF3WXqGr
 wa7wSux41cuZn4=
Received: by filter0464p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id
 filter0464p1mdw1.28883.56FFE20CB
 2016-04-02 15:15:24.087793685 +0000 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [178.22.70.186])
 by ismtpd0002p1lon1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 2DxAGxIQQZmUsuYbq5xuyg
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 15:15:24.084 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <b5cc236714de44496df72d17837b2de9@swift.generated>
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 15:15:23 +0000
From: "" <e347c518@ghostmail.com>
To: "" <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SG-EID: hWCmWJXosRCYKf8z2fTuxpNWXkMRx90iZwgRF8Zvi3a5dIO3BQFcB1Q9vDuuSSId+gX4hms2vdR74o
 LtbNvthfCG38JIAZaFCv2NAVm3x+n+vz1m58PGC8cVfTQhKQQW/FTVJWv1EKlzuQyvs5+8TST3Elja
 uUteKoVa+AEJN03Iv0q5mmYM++IQpGOGno3Xjra5bCy3Mp9kVd/uWKDT8nWBDotLSU6M3hd5JRKv+m
 M=
X-SG-ID: gnwugAPEk90ONPODfP9Nu5eMJKvU344rgC7F4CGQb8xOBSRdVxA/bMXMZvK51Ky1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [tor-talk] Tor and child pornography
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

I think it's pretty clear that when someone puts on the list a complain about a popular hidden service being attacked, and refuse to give any information about the identity of the hidden service due to "legal", e.g. traffic shaping attacks recently, it will be a child pornography operation. It is well known that Tor onion sites are a haven for this, and research has shown a lot of hidden services use is related to these sites.




Is it really appropriate to use the tor-talk list to encourage child abuse? I do not think so. Obviously there is not much that can be done about these immoral websites due to the nature of Tor, but as the wider community of users of Tor, should not specifically helping child pornographers fix or protect their hidden service onions.


        Sent from secure GhostMail. Easy and free encrypted email, chat and cloud storage, free sign up here: https://www.ghostmail.com

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

