Delivery-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 05:06:07 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A75771E0376;
	Fri, 29 Apr 2016 05:06:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B19B3A2BB;
	Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:06:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6697B3A2AB
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:05:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 5EqdKu93WBUu for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:05:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22e.google.com (mail-yw0-x22e.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22e])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45E8E3A263
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:05:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id g133so152573157ywb.2
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 02:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc; bh=WAEPWrPdQEEgzSdS+vD6zaZC7Kvz7o6fguNnkVjOQyE=;
 b=Wysoe3MBNlBrU9EQL2Nuwx8WXk6ytJApT/F5XviSlxCNGgfMWBUvg6COXV/hDWv5Wf
 55jtl1bcuAWIHd5YkO5zS3D3hyKhbNbZZ0QQz1GxuT6XUHBk9+Udxetdwr0e6CrLgNNE
 cdD4E5oOELO/zrnnrtjNHtAAoPxi/jKrLZyOaPCHzWGhF1YrLHYU9MwFQwoeoEa64Ql3
 jLj7EXXWOKMEuWIYWk87MDtB4cWroeabeEYHQVWuefEMBBtM1T8xTWfN6wYR1u3Y71EC
 G24cgrgxDJUVDOCod/CLYx6y11u36FdqeWX8BVRkHQYPAzI9jjkKlvE9NClDnm+N94wk
 0ZvQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to:cc;
 bh=WAEPWrPdQEEgzSdS+vD6zaZC7Kvz7o6fguNnkVjOQyE=;
 b=GJWk69gkyIezxRSQ8PHge4VbXgTerevswhfaINNojhBbRxxW7T7MJpiAZ4GGvT+50V
 bdR9W4kkRfixqwR989JG0dsUV6he5+R9DMSVCzgrp4R/Drj2wvon+6HKtdVcQfiKgfju
 Cp5vjttViB/B0X4Kk6qR47BMSfXBnUQXk1Z7PszdtFJuLXAV/wwREq/77GdAVYu1Z0EF
 zMr1VsDiyWKdXBniB+2NrCLHOiiXny2GuPtpfPhKBv1wwdo8DeURaBtms0qleHVv7n32
 CCF6CZR672JSDFmli4Njk7SZgoQm7Jpl2mxA+fSxUnhpZd+0kXSEjY6UMl9mSKEBVnRu
 mT8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUEf4MHHdKdGlTBSTh1QDFqZSXOuaIrkdlbitWd3h8xEkVB5hJ/yOzR5BZUPdv5jrwmJMOX61FV4h8krQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.159.36.51 with SMTP id 48mr10607444uaq.74.1461920753688;
 Fri, 29 Apr 2016 02:05:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.159.34.229 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 02:05:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5722B982.6090407@cyblings.on.ca>
References: <5722B982.6090407@cyblings.on.ca>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 05:05:53 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD2Ti29sHx4TVeeFJ0JrpwUeAccZ8+vTPMHr3p2M3C0kPF5dNg@mail.gmail.com>
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Cc: cypherpunks@cpunks.org, cryptography@metzdowd.com
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Supreme Court Gives FBI More Hacking Power
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 4/28/16, krishna e bera <keb@cyblings.on.ca> wrote:
> https://theintercept.com/2016/04/28/supreme-court-gives-fbi-more-hacking-power/
> http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/frcr16_8mad.pdf
https://www.justsecurity.org/15018/justice-department-proposal-massive-expand-fbi-extraterritorial-surveillance/

Among others commenting on the lists...

Rule 41(b)(6)
"a magistrate judge with authority in *any* district
where activities related to a crime *may* have
occurred has authority to issue a warrant..."

Note *emphasis*.

Perhaps missing from the article is that, similar to FISC / DC
situation, this seems to allow LEA / Prosecutors to now cozy all
these requests up to the friendliest court they can find (if they
speculate, when concealed, that the activities *may* in fact be in
that district [1]), rather than forcing distribution of requests
randomly across them all (similar to the old principle of local
jurisdiction... crimes originate randomly, are dealt with locally).

That would be bad... bad precedents, much stuff under seal ex parte
en camera rubberstamp etc.

[1] Without such speculation, while still concealed, they would
probably end up being lodged by location of lead investigative
entity (even FBI HQ), or by other elements of the case, such
as victim location.


https://www.accessnow.org/cms/assets/uploads/archive/docs/Rule41botnettestimony.pdf

Rule 41(b)(6)(B)
18 USC 1030(a)(5)
And remote access of hacked protected computers... that's huge
procedural change, and likely to be very sloppy and outright abused
for ages.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_judicial_district
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

