Delivery-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 17:04:30 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89D6A1E0AB0
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Tue,  7 Apr 2015 17:04:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C048534A81;
	Tue,  7 Apr 2015 21:04:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6516734A7E
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  7 Apr 2015 21:04:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id tVUXJ9_BOKOy for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue,  7 Apr 2015 21:04:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFE6E248A3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  7 Apr 2015 21:04:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plantcutter.riseup.net (plantcutter-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.121])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09D6741167
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  7 Apr 2015 21:04:13 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1428440655; bh=tzR/cbFTiJQp464Kfpv6/KgM54QLNz3lc9YNTZS30hc=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=HXtmeQ1Cty9g5UJrERnlyPHwFzD5ChABB4XJSfI1ChBO98xquWAbijXBLg4xXrM7h
 LMtmrH66RDCE7QCYWlFj2VtVWhn7qq+5nOvK3DzR270eIEOf7WmHHI2Uvt1itz9tSq
 jGOcxv9b+m/909eJDfnbQ240OZvUHQFpu59vfpLU=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: when2plus2is5) with ESMTPSA id 27CDE2277D
Message-ID: <55244645.8040304@riseup.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 21:04:05 +0000
From: Speak Freely <when2plus2is5@riseup.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <CAJdkzENkpzmB3k3GitOO2b97PGMh8peWafomT+jnK5jY3sz-dw@mail.gmail.com>
 <5521e3f8.8d908c0a.06a5.ffffa176@mx.google.com>
 <CAOsGNSSudiu0NnFfEnD+DrUwghYwX9e0sehjY2ZoiSZ-m0=0iw@mail.gmail.com>
 <5522002f.8d908c0a.06a5.ffffae25@mx.google.com>
 <CAOsGNSSjtw=xM4GgsYtWh02f-MFrkh_UmLs4eKdxbYqQE7L-FA@mail.gmail.com>
 <55230da1.e40f370a.05be.5582@mx.google.com>
 <20150407003544.GA19670@vpn212046.nrl.navy.mil>
 <5524434d.e65b8c0a.a3d8.0f31@mx.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <5524434d.e65b8c0a.a3d8.0f31@mx.google.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.6 at mx1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor Summer of Privacy
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Holy fuck you're still talking? Give it a rest buddy.



Juan:
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 20:35:44 -0400
> Paul Syverson <paul.syverson@nrl.navy.mil> wrote:
> 
> 
>>
>> More details on the history at
>> https://www.acsac.org/2011/program/keynotes/
>>
>>>
>>> 	I mean we don't need to repeat yet again that tor is a
>>> 	project of the US military. As such it doesn't make
>>> 	sense for it to be 'decentralized'.
>>
>> For the technical reasons behind the degree and nature of
>> centralization and decentralization, see the above paper and the Tor
>> design paper. Also note that ironically the first few major design
>> versions made purely by govt. employees were actually more
>> decentralized. E.g. see the above paper, also
>> http://www.onion-router.net/Archives/TNG.html
>> It was only when we moved to the Tor design, that we moved to being
>> a bit less P2P with directory authorities. 
> 
> 
> 	And what point are you making with all that hand waving? 'a bit
> 	less p2p'? That's some technical language. 
> 
> 
>>
>> For more technical arguments why this is in practice more secure than
>> other designs known at the time see
>>  http://freehaven.net/anonbib/#danezis-pet2008 and
>>  http://freehaven.net/anonbib/#entropist
> 
> 
> 	Even assuming that the central servers are more
> 	'secure' (although that's vague - more secure for whom
> 	against what kind of attacks) the fact remains that centralized
> 	control over the network is something obviously in line with
> 	the political objectives of your employers. 
> 
> 	
> 
> 
>>
>> But by all means please continue justifying everything you say based
>> on what you tenaciously are sure some large organizations must intend
> 
> 	Is your contention that your employers don't have any purpose
> 	at all?  Or that the government responsible for a global
> 	surveillance system (among many other sick crimes) also pays you
> 	to counter them? lol 
> 
> 	See, you can play that game only so far. You can pretend to be a
> 	'technician' who knows nothing about politics only so far.
> 
> 	On the other hand I do realize that you are just playing a part
> 	here, for your audience of lackeys. 
> 
> 	Obviously you are not going to admit that you are just a tool
> 	of the US military providing them with resources to 'spread
> 	democracy' in 'oppressed countries'.
> 
> 	https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covert_United_States_foreign_regime_change_actions
> 
> 	https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_regime_change
> 
> 	
> 
> 
>> rather than the technical design reasons that have been published and
>> publically vetted by the best scientific and technical researchers on
>> the planet
> 
> 
> 	Oh boy. Are you arrogant.
> 
> 	By the way, have you and your friends received any national
> 	security letter lately?
> 
> 
>> from the most respected advanced institutions in every
>> country. What could they possibly add to the truly dizzying intellect
>> manifest in your arguments to date?
>>
>> Apologies to others for failing to resist feeding the troll. 
> 
> 
> 	
> 	So, you have nothing but name calling. And funnily enough whine
> 	about 'ad hominems'.  Unintentional self-parody at its best. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Guess I'm
>> tired.  Here's a little ad hominem of my own: Moritz started it.
>>
>> aloha,
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

