Delivery-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 04:19:18 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40DB11E00C2
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Tue,  7 Apr 2015 04:19:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3E933F23;
	Tue,  7 Apr 2015 08:19:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3533733F0A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  7 Apr 2015 08:19:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id ztnk119peu4O for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue,  7 Apr 2015 08:19:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from Mailamir.com (mailamir.com [198.27.109.33])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CA113355A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  7 Apr 2015 08:19:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by Mailamir.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC6020F40
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  7 Apr 2015 03:27:22 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at Mailamir.com
Received: from Mailamir.com ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (Mailamir.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id LlYIupaXiVoK for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue,  7 Apr 2015 03:27:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.167] (ppp118-209-120-223.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net
 [118.209.120.223])
 by Mailamir.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C134420EC5
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  7 Apr 2015 03:27:18 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <552392F5.7030102@gassiep.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 18:19:01 +1000
From: Naz Gassiep <naz@gassiep.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <551EC44F.8080107@openmailbox.org> <87lhi52iyg.fsf@example.com>
 <5522DDE5.4080604@openmailbox.org>
In-Reply-To: <5522DDE5.4080604@openmailbox.org>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Hi!
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 7/04/2015 5:26 AM, gary02121993@openmailbox.org wrote:
> I'm suppose to write about ethical, social, legal and professional
> issues raised by my topic - which is Tor - based off of UK legislation
> and standards in Information Systems.

Well, how about you say something a little less loaded than "the 
malicious uses for Tor are ...".

Say something like "Tor is a tool, and like all tools it can be used 
with good and bad intentions. Some examples of good uses are a, b, and 
c, while examples of malicious uses are d, e, and f." Then you have a 
wide range of very interesting discussions that can be engaged in, such 
as exploring methods that society can use to determine the merit of 
encouraging or discouraging things that result in both good and bad 
outcomes. Where are the thresholds? What metrics would you use to 
determine "goodness" and "badness"? Why does Naz not have a bowl ice 
cream on his desk right now? You know, important issues like that.

Please note my use of the Oxford Comma, it is the most important part of 
what I said.

Regards,
- Naz.

>
> On 04/06/2015 10:46 PM, W. Greenhouse wrote:
>> gary02121993@openmailbox.org writes:
>>
>>> I'm writing about Tor for my Ethics module. Do you guys mind if you tell
>>> me some malicious uses with Tor? Anything will be of great help. Yeah I
>>> already know of the basic or common use cases. :)
>> It does not sound like this course is being run with a great deal of
>> empiricism and impartiality if the instructor is only interested in
>> "malicious" uses of Tor.
>>

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

