Delivery-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 13:27:14 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03BC61E0B34
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Mon,  6 Apr 2015 13:27:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4430033FC2;
	Mon,  6 Apr 2015 17:27:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674F433EF6
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  6 Apr 2015 17:27:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id QP_GXXCcvRHK for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon,  6 Apr 2015 17:27:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.headstrong.de (mail.headstrong.de [81.7.4.112])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37EC933EF2
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  6 Apr 2015 17:27:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.headstrong.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7629B1C001BB
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  6 Apr 2015 19:27:02 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=headstrong.de;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type
 :in-reply-to:references:subject:subject:mime-version:from:from
 :date:date:message-id:received; s=mail; t=1428341221; x=
 1430155622; bh=Q/cVqNp7de/lg1wq8hO99IWUb7pOLGft76Q+//vlGxo=; b=F
 pJbxoE51jauYd/RByXZvHSkiGjP1g3oT1SIPqJQAATMX001nn81Wu3VqjgDQHe1V
 XCRJfGQHD44GXpHm+jJbOpzO+DIO4wFW6OJgkDj8+0TSBUnoWicn4NnF4MmIywL3
 y7xGrUP2Fu8eYdRXg6DbiG1g0aXLGUYM77SDUUNMxY=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.headstrong.de
Received: from mail.headstrong.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail.headstrong.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
 with ESMTP id a-Sm2HKg4Kzu for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon,  6 Apr 2015 19:27:01 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5522C1E3.2090202@torservers.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 19:26:59 +0200
From: Moritz Bartl <moritz@torservers.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <CAJdkzENkpzmB3k3GitOO2b97PGMh8peWafomT+jnK5jY3sz-dw@mail.gmail.com>
 <5521e3f8.8d908c0a.06a5.ffffa176@mx.google.com>
 <CAOsGNSSudiu0NnFfEnD+DrUwghYwX9e0sehjY2ZoiSZ-m0=0iw@mail.gmail.com>
 <5522002f.8d908c0a.06a5.ffffae25@mx.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <5522002f.8d908c0a.06a5.ffffae25@mx.google.com>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor Summer of Privacy
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 04/06/2015 05:44 AM, Juan wrote:
> 	I doubt that's something the US military is going to favor. I'm
> 	guessing that having a bunch of 'directory authorities' under
> 	their full control was one of the basic design requirements.

This is bullshit. I don't even know why I am replying to this, but you
better make your homework before you make stupid accusations like that
and embarrass yourself.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

