Delivery-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:46:48 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 244E01E1040
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:46:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2346348D3;
	Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:46:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F98348BD
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:46:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id Uyhe7YhmxKzH for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:46:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59CA3348AB
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:46:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from berryeater.riseup.net (berryeater-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.120])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5775640D8F
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:46:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1430419591; bh=oZLobYkjeu7Q5u1A9nQpj3Cq5Dxsuj5xfnGSFlBoHO8=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=gy3a+zFub2hRngN/qT/lsugp73kh+S57xKiczFXJLjQIcO0S3/Mn6pKZrg4YtqctE
 Pk5RSF1pBiezyG/ppcyna0geYt1RPfPlhe0JRbRDIoSBdYz03eJ7Ak+klwUrLPPChl
 fwxkOkugcIG0v0LGh7yu5iZVRnvIAl2QjctBT62E=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: when2plus2is5) with ESMTPSA id E4BEF3F809
Message-ID: <55427887.7020405@riseup.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:46:31 +0000
From: Speak Freely <when2plus2is5@riseup.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <CAHvMVPQtZ3tHWTAMyrsbTZoK_sEUWXf0cKULe==P2aD16MC+ww@mail.gmail.com>
 <554246CB.3000501@riseup.net>
 <CAHvMVPSapRwSqvMgFhV3DWmOxF4knAQ3MwAHK3a3SAYPL9dJuQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHvMVPSapRwSqvMgFhV3DWmOxF4knAQ3MwAHK3a3SAYPL9dJuQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.6 at mx1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Full integration with bitcoin (suggestion / feature
 request)
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Hi Felipe,

It's an issue that is relevant to Tor, and in many online communities.
So please don't think it's a bad idea, it's just a very complicated one.

Incentivizing (part of) the system is not necessarily a bad thing.
Something to encourage bigger and better relays is good.

One potential work-around would be to allow up to X% of any given relay
to be used for the express lane, but to always have the rest completely
open. I could envision up to 10% of total throughput to be dedicated to
paying customers, and 90% for everyone else. If every exit relay's
express quota is full, you wouldn't pay. At most I think $10USD/TB would
be acceptable - though I'm not a fan of this anyway.


Personally, I'm a fan of badges and social rewards. I've read quite a
few books and many blogs and studies on the topic. For several varying
reason, people like to collect things, regardless of actual monetary
value - and in fact sometimes directly because of the lack of monetary
value. A reward that must be earned and cannot be purchased. The social
standing badges and awards create is fascinating. I fully appreciate
this may not work given the current community atmosphere, but I mention
it nonetheless because it is interesting.


Regarding forking the system, of course you could! But that leads to so
many other issues...

-----------

Akater,

BT on Tor is bad for at least 2 reasons.
1) BT will do what it what it can to connect to peers, including
bypassing Tor, which could leak information about you, which negates the
reason for downloading off Tor. This isn't Tor's fault.
2) It's just mean! :)

I find the BT/Tor problem to be... BT. This is beyond the scope of this
discussion, however.

A good blog post is
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/bittorrent-over-tor-isnt-good-idea


Matt
Speak Freely
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

